ArticleNanoscale2022
Correlation of cell mechanics with the resistance to malignant transformation in naked mole rat fibroblasts.
Article in Nanoscale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical Way To Study Molecular Structure of Pericellular Layer.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Naked mole rats (NMRs) demonstrate exceptional longevity and resistance to cancer. Using a biochemical approach, it was previously shown that the treatment of mouse fibroblast cells with RasV12 oncogene and SV40 Large T antigen (viral oncoprotein) led to malignant transformations of cells. In contrast, NMR fibroblasts were resistant to malignant transformations upon this treatment. Here we demonstrate that atomic force microscopy (AFM) can provide information which is in agreement with the above finding, and further, adds unique information about the physical properties of cells that is impossible to obtain by other existing techniques. AFM indentation data were collected from individual cells and subsequently processed through the brush model to obtain information about the mechanics of the cell body (absolute values of the effective Young's moduli). Furthermore, information about the physical properties of the pericellular layer surrounding the cells was obtained. We found a statistically significant decrease in the rigidity of mouse cells after the treatment, whereas there was no significant change found in the rigidity of NMR cells upon the treatment. We also found that the treatment caused a substantial increase in a long part of the pericellular layer in NMR cells only (the long brush was defined as having a size of >10 microns). The mouse cells and smaller brush did not show statistically significant changes upon treatment. The observed change in cell mechanics is in agreement with the frequently observed decrease in cell rigidity during progression towards cancer. The change in the pericellular layer due to the malignant transformation of fibroblast cells has practically not been studied, though it was shown that the removal of part of the pericellular layer of NMR fibroblasts made the cells susceptible to malignant transformation. Although it is plausible to speculate that the observed increase in the long part of the brush layer of NMR cells might help cells to resist malignant transformations, the significance of the observed change in the pericellular layer is yet to be understood. As of now, we can conclude that changes in cell mechanics might be used as an indication of the resistance of NMR cells to malignant transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.