Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36155667›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2022

Mouse models of COVID-19 recapitulate inflammatory pathways rather than gene expression.

Cameron R Bishop, Troy Dumenil, Daniel J Rawle, Thuy T Le, Kexin Yan, Bing Tang, Gunter Hartel, Andreas Suhrbier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Safety concern of recombination between self-amplifying mRNA vaccines and viruses is mitigated in vivo.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Animal models for COVID-19 and tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cameron R BishopImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-9942
Troy DumenilImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel J RawleImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Thuy T LeImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kexin YanImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Bing TangImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Gunter HartelStatistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andreas SuhrbierImmunology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8986-9025
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How well mouse models recapitulate the transcriptional profiles seen in humans remains debatable, with both conservation and diversity identified in various settings. Herein we use RNA-Seq data and bioinformatics approaches to analyze the transcriptional responses in SARS-CoV-2 infected lungs, comparing 4 human studies with the widely used K18-hACE2 mouse model, a model where hACE2 is expressed from the mouse ACE2 promoter, and a model that uses a mouse adapted virus and wild-type mice. Overlap of single copy orthologue differentially expressed genes (scoDEGs) between human and mouse studies was generally poor (≈15-35%). Rather than being associated with batch, sample treatment, viral load, lung damage or mouse model, the poor overlaps were primarily due to scoDEG expression differences between species. Importantly, analyses of immune signatures and inflammatory pathways illustrated highly significant concordances between species. As immunity and immunopathology are the focus of most studies, these mouse models can thus be viewed as representative and relevant models of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionHumansLungMiceMice, TransgenicPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A

Identifiers

PMID36155667
PMCPMC9536645
OpenAlexW4297254252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.