Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36155654›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

New methodology of TMB assessment from tissue and liquid biopsy in NSCLC.

Ľudmila Křížová, Markéta Šafaříková, Marta Kalousová, Lucie Pfeiferová, Aleš Antonín Kuběna, Michal Vočka, Jan Ulrych, Věra Franková, Luboš Petruželka, Tomáš Zima and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ľudmila KřížováDepartment of Oncology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-7363
Markéta ŠafaříkováInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marta KalousováInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie PfeiferováInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Aleš Antonín KuběnaInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal VočkaDepartment of Oncology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan UlrychFirst Department of Surgery, Department of Abdominal, Thoracic Surgery and Traumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Věra FrankováDepartment of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Luboš PetruželkaDepartment of Oncology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš ZimaInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
David FeltlDepartment of Oncology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has dramatically influenced and changed therapeutical approach in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent five years. Even though we can reach long-term response to this treatment in approximately 20% of patients with NSCLC, we are still not able to identify this cohort of patients based on predictive biomarkers. In our study we have focused on tumor mutation burden (TMB), one of the potential biomarkers which could predict effectiveness of check-point inhibitors, but has several limitations, especially in multiple approaches to TMB quantification and ununiform threshold. We determined the value of TMB in tumor tissue (tTMB) and blood (bTMB) in 20 patients with early stage NSCLC using original custom gene panel LMB_TMB1. We evaluated various possibilities of TMB calculation and concluded that TMB should be counted from both somatic non-synonymous and synonymous mutations. Considering various factors, we established cut-offs of tTMB in/excluding HLA genes as ≥22 mut/Mb and 12 mut/Mb respectively, and cut-offs of bTMB were defined as ≥21 mut/Mb and ≥5 mut/Mb, respectively. We also observed trend in correlation of somatic mutations in HLA genes with overall survival of patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID36155654
PMCPMC9512185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.