Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36155272›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2023

The Influence of Rural Healthcare Systems and Communities on Surgery and Recovery: A Qualitative Study.

Jordan E Johnson, Josh Bleicher, Allison N Blumling, Brian T Cain, Jessica N Cohan, Mark Savarise, Alex H S Harris, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Lyen C Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordan E JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: Jordan.esplin@hsc.utah.edu.
Josh BleicherDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Allison N BlumlingDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Brian T CainDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jessica N CohanDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Mark SavariseDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alex H S HarrisVA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Washington, District of Columbia.
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Lyen C HuangDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Vascular Health and Risk Factors in Children with Down SyndromeKL2TR002539 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MURTAUGH, MAUREEN A, NYGAARD, INGRID E · 2018 to 2022
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002539NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuccessful recovery after surgery is complex and highly individual. Rural patients encounter greater barriers to successful surgical recovery than urban patients due to varying healthcare and community factors. Although studies have previously examined the recovery process, rural patients' experiences with recovery have not been well-studied. The rural socioecological context can provide insights into potential barriers or facilitators to rural patient recovery after surgery.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of 30 adult general surgery patients from rural areas in the Mountain West region of the United States. We used the socioecological framework to analyze their responses. Interviews focused on rural participants' experiences accessing healthcare and the impact of family and community support during postoperative recovery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using content and thematic analysis.

resultsAll participants commented on the quality of their rural healthcare systems and its influence on postoperative care. Some enjoyed the trust developed through long-standing relationships with providers in their communities. However, participants described community providers' lack of money, equipment, and/or knowledge as barriers to care. Following surgery, participants recognized that there are advantages and disadvantages to receiving family and community support. Some participants worried about being stigmatized or judged by their community.

conclusionsFuture interventions aimed at improving access to and recovery from surgery for rural patients should take into account the unique perspectives of rural patients. Addressing the socioecological factors surrounding rural surgery patients, such as healthcare, family, and community resources, will be key to improving postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRural PopulationAdultHumansQualitative ResearchGeneral surgeryPostoperative recoveryRural communitiesRural health systemsRural surgery

Identifiers

PMID36155272
PMCPMC10473841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.