ArticleArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2022
Risk predictors of advanced hepatic fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - a survey in a university hospital in Brazil.
Article in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes and Non-Invasive Testing in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis With Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of type 2 diabetes in patients with NAFLD or MAFLD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Chronic hepatitis B with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Association between glycemic control and liver fibrosis.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Comparing FIB-4, VCTE, pSWE, 2D-SWE, and MRE Thresholds and Diagnostic Accuracies for Detecting Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Differential risk factors of fibrosis between lean and obese MAFLD.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Observational
- Development and validation of a scoring system to predict MASLD patients with significant hepatic fibrosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Describe the clinical profile of patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and analyze the risk predictors of hepatic fibrosis in outpatient follow-up at a university hospital. Methods: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of a cohort of 143 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were retrospectively analysed under univariate analyses. Diagnostic accuracy, determined by AUROC, was evaluated for variables that showed a significant difference in univariate comparison analysis and diagnostic performances were determined by sensitivity and specificity. Results: The mean age of studied patients were 48 years, 66.4% of them were women. Age, presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and laboratory variables such as AST/ALT ratio, GGT, platelet count and fasting glucose were significantly associated with advanced fibrosis. FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score (AUROC 0.82 and 0.89, respectively) outperformed APRI (AUROC 0.73) for advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis ( Conclusion: In our study, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, hypertension, AST/ALT ratio, GGT, platelet count and fasting glucose were associated with hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. The non-invasive tests FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score showed the best accuracy to stratify disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.