ArticleThe Permanente journal2022
Engaging Stakeholders in Social Determinants of Health Quality Improvement Efforts.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2025Pooled it
- Operationalising Inclusion for Participatory Design: Worked Examples for TRIPOD+AI & PROBAST+AI.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Applications in Population and Public Health: Guidelines for Development, Testing, and Implementation.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Leveraging Qualitative Insights for Dashboard Development to Address Perinatal Health Inequalities in Maternity, Neonatal and Perinatal Services.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Trusted partners, community priorities, and data protections: requirements for precision medicine research with Alaska Native peoples.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Familial Glucocorticoid Deficiency in Twins: A Novel Mutation and Impact on Social Determinants of Health Outcome.JCEM case reports · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities in perinatal public health: the utility of perinatal health inequality dashboards in addressing disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- The intersection of social and Indigenous determinants of health for health system strengthening: a scoping review.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024Article
- Patient centered or provider centered? The inclusion of social determinants of health in emergency department billing and coding.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect around 70% of health outcomes. However, it is not clear how to integrate SDOH into clinical practice and health care policy. This quality improvement project engaged stakeholders to identify SDOH factors relevant in an Alaska Native/American Indian health system and how to integrate SDOH data into electronic health records (EHRs). Methods The authors utilized an internal steering committee of clinical leadership; conducted focus groups with patients, practitioners, administrative staff, and clinical leaders; developed programmatic workgroups to engage with the health system; and coordinated with allied health systems. Results The Steering Committee members prioritized uses of SDOH data. Focus groups grounded work in local community values and refined SDOH subdomains. Workgroups developed data visualizations, such as EHR dashboards, to automate data collection for reporting and assess performance metrics. External stakeholders helped innovate ways to utilize SDOH data through community partnerships and advocacy work. Stakeholders liked how the holistic approach of SDOH looks at whole-person wellness and how it can improve patient-practitioner relationships and reduce health disparities. They were concerned about outdated SDOH data and how some sensitive SDOH could lead to unanticipated harms. Leaders emphasized developing an actionable, strengths-based SDOH framework. Conclusions Many initiatives call for integrating SDOH into health care and EHRs. Engaging diverse audiences helps guide the work. This engagement may be particularly helpful for minority-serving health systems. SDOH data collection can be stigmatizing for patients. Stakeholder engagement can mitigate that by identifying which SDOH data elements to prioritize, and how to utilize them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.