Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36154868›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2023

Training Deep Learning Models to Work on Multiple Devices by Cross-Domain Learning with No Additional Annotations.

Yue Wu, Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Ryan Yanagihara, Timothy-Paul H Kung, Randy Lu, Irene Leung, Amit V Mishra, Hanan Nussinovitch, Gabriela Grimaldi, Marian Blazes and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Initiation of a global consortium to study the progression of age-related macular degeneration: RIMR AMD consortium report # 1.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Clinician's Guide to Sharing Data for AI in Ophthalmology.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Deep learning in optical coherence tomography: Where are the gaps?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abraham Olvera-BarriosMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ryan YanagiharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Timothy-Paul H KungDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Randy LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Irene LeungMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Amit V MishraMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Hanan NussinovitchMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gabriela GrimaldiMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Marian BlazesDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Cecilia S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, Washington.
Catherine EganMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aaron Y LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: leeay@uw.edu.
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Translational pharmacoepidemiology: neuroprotection and neurotoxicity of antihypertensives and strong anticholinergicsU19AG066567 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Paul K Crane, Andrea Z. LaCroix · 2021 to 2026
$80.4M
Aging eyes and aging brains in studying alzheimer's disease: Modern ophthalmic data collection in the adult changes in thought (ACT) studyR01AG060942 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Cecilia Sungmin Lee · 2019 to 2026
$39.4M
Bridge2AI:Salutogenesis Data Generation ProjectOT2OD032644 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G · 2022 to 2025
$32.7M
Multi-modal Health Information Technology Innovations for Precision Management of GlaucomaDP5OD029610 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of diabetic macular edemaK23EY029246 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, AARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY029246NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060942NIA NIH HHS U19 AG066567NIH HHS DP5 OD029610NIH HHS OT2 OD032644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo create an unsupervised cross-domain segmentation algorithm for segmenting intraretinal fluid and retinal layers on normal and pathologic macular OCT images from different manufacturers and camera devices.

designWe sought to use generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generalize a segmentation model trained on one OCT device to segment B-scans obtained from a different OCT device manufacturer in a fully unsupervised approach without labeled data from the latter manufacturer.

participantsA total of 732 OCT B-scans from 4 different OCT devices (Heidelberg Spectralis, Topcon 1000, Maestro2, and Zeiss Plex Elite 9000).

methodsWe developed an unsupervised GAN model, GANSeg, to segment 7 retinal layers and intraretinal fluid in Topcon 1000 OCT images (domain B) that had access only to labeled data on Heidelberg Spectralis images (domain A). GANSeg was unsupervised because it had access only to 110 Heidelberg labeled OCTs and 556 raw and unlabeled Topcon 1000 OCTs. To validate GANSeg segmentations, 3 masked graders manually segmented 60 OCTs from an external Topcon 1000 test dataset independently. To test the limits of GANSeg, graders also manually segmented 3 OCTs from Zeiss Plex Elite 9000 and Topcon Maestro2. A U-Net was trained on the same labeled Heidelberg images as baseline. The GANSeg repository with labeled annotations is at https://github.com/uw-biomedical-ml/ganseg.

main outcome measuresDice scores comparing segmentation results from GANSeg and the U-Net model with the manual segmented images.

resultsAlthough GANSeg and U-Net achieved comparable Dice scores performance as human experts on the labeled Heidelberg test dataset, only GANSeg achieved comparable Dice scores with the best performance for the ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (90%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 68%-96%) and the worst performance for intraretinal fluid (58%; 95% CI, 18%-89%), which was statistically similar to human graders (79%; 95% CI, 43%-94%). GANSeg significantly outperformed the U-Net model. Moreover, GANSeg generalized to both Zeiss and Topcon Maestro2 swept-source OCT domains, which it had never encountered before.

conclusionsGANSeg enables the transfer of supervised deep learning algorithms across OCT devices without labeled data, thereby greatly expanding the applicability of deep learning algorithms.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceCross-domain learningMaculaOCTRetinaUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID36154868
PMCPMC9868052
OpenAlexW4296690014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.