Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36154387›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2022

Model for Evaluating Antimicrobial Therapy To Prevent Life-Threatening Bacterial Infections following Exposure to a Medically Significant Radiation Dose.

Andrew J Phipps, Julie N Bergmann, Mark T Albrecht, Vijay K Singh, Mary J Homer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J PhippsBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Julie N BergmannBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Mark T AlbrechtBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Vijay K SinghDivision of Radioprotection, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mary J HomerBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-7672
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More evidence is needed to support recommendations for medical management of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and associated infections resulting from a radiological/nuclear event. While current guidelines recommend the administration of antibiotics to chemotherapy patients with febrile neutropenia, the clinical benefit is unclear for acute radiation injury patients. A well-characterized nonhuman primate (NHP) model of hematopoietic ARS was developed that incorporates supportive care postirradiation. This model evaluated the efficacy of myeloid growth factors within 24 to 48 h after total body irradiation (TBI). However, in this model, NHPs continued to develop life-threatening bacterial infections, even when granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was administered in combination with antibiotic monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of combination antibiotic therapies administered to NHPs following 7.4-Gy TBI to understand the occurrence of bacterial infection in NHPs with hematopoietic ARS. We compared enrofloxacin-linezolid, enrofloxacin-cefepime, and enrofloxacin-ertapenem to enrofloxacin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was 60-day postirradiation mortality, with secondary endpoints of overall survival time, incidence of bacterial infection, and bacteriologic culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We observed that enrofloxacin-ertapenem significantly increased survival compared to enrofloxacin monotherapy. Bacteria isolated from nonsurviving macaques with systemic bacterial infections exhibited uniform resistance to enrofloxacin and variable resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, gentamicin, and azithromycin. Multidrug antibiotic resistance was observed in

Indexed as

Acute Radiation SyndromeAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinCefepimeEnrofloxacinErtapenemGentamicinsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorLinezolidRadiation DosageAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAzithromycinCefepimeEnrofloxacinErtapenemGentamicinsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorLinezolidacute radiation syndromeantibiotic resistanceantibioticsneutropenia

Identifiers

PMID36154387
PMCPMC9578420
OpenAlexW4297238964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.