Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36154140›Full record

ArticlemSystems2022

Interaction Networks Are Driven by Community-Responsive Phenotypes in a Chitin-Degrading Consortium of Soil Microbes.

Ryan McClure, Yuliya Farris, Robert Danczak, William Nelson, Hyun-Seob Song, Aimee Kessell, Joon-Yong Lee, Sneha Couvillion, Christopher Henry, Janet K Jansson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Interspecies interactions determine growth dynamics of biopolymer-degrading populations in microbial communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan McClureBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-6917
Yuliya FarrisBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.
Robert DanczakBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-192X
William NelsonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-3929
Hyun-Seob SongDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-6358
Aimee KessellDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Joon-Yong LeeBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.
Sneha CouvillionBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.
Christopher HenryData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA.
Janet K JanssonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-4315
Kirsten S HofmockelBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratorygrid.451303.0, Richland, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-2167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microorganisms provide key ecological functions that often rely on metabolic interactions between individual populations of the soil microbiome. To better understand these interactions and community processes, we used chitin, a major carbon and nitrogen source in soil, as a test substrate to investigate microbial interactions during its decomposition. Chitin was applied to a model soil consortium that we developed, "model soil consortium-2" (MSC-2), consisting of eight members of diverse phyla and including both chitin degraders and nondegraders. A multiomics approach revealed how MSC-2 community-level processes during chitin decomposition differ from monocultures of the constituent species. Emergent properties of both species and the community were found, including changes in the chitin degradation potential of

Indexed as

ChitinMicrobiotaCarbonNitrogenSoilCarbonChitinNitrogenSoilchitinchitin decompositionconsortiametabolic interactionsmodel microbiomesoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID36154140
PMCPMC9599572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.