ArticleJournal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery2022
Complications and risk factors after digital subtraction angiography: 1-year single-center study.
Article in Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Estimation of Blood Velocity from TOF-MRA Arterial Centerlines: Theory, Simulation, and Inverse Solution.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decadal Changes in Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Angiography: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Intravenous Cone-Beam CT for Follow-up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the Woven EndoBridge Device.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Ophthalmic artery stenosis presenting as amaurosis fugax.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Commercial AI platforms improve reproducibility but fail to meet clinical precision thresholds for intracranial aneurysm measurement: implications for serial surveillance.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Few-shot learning for highly accelerated 3D time-of-flight MRA reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Oblique occipital sinus in neurosurgical practice: A retrospective analysis of imaging studies.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Could MR Angio Replace Digital Subtraction Angiography for Verification of Occlusion Rate of Cerebral Aneurysms?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- DSA Versus Noninvasive Imaging in Revascularization Referral for Recently Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Methodological Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2025Review
- Multidetector computed tomography angiography for diagnosis of traumatic aneurysms associated with penetrating head injuries.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025Article
- Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 1.5 Tesla Using Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT).Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Procedure Dynamics in Transfemoral vs Transradial Cerebral Angiography: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- The Arterial Anatomy of the Cerebellum-A Comprehensive Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage during pregnancy or puerperium: A nationwide study.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Complications and risk factors after digital subtraction angiography: 1-year single-center study.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Middle meningeal artery embolization for symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma in the setting of severe transfusion-refractory thrombocytopenia: A case study and review of literature.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDigital subtraction angiography (DSA) is an imaging technique used to diagnose and confirm abnormal lesions of cerebral blood vessels in various situations. Several complications such as cerebral infarction, contrast-induced allergy, and angio-site hematoma or infection can occur after DSA. We investigated complication rates and risk factors related to DSA.
methodsAll patients who underwent DSA at Incheon St. Mary's Hospital from January to December 2021 were included. Those who underwent emergency DSA due to stroke or who underwent endovascular surgery within 1 week after DSA were excluded. Complications that occurred within 1 week after DSA were included in the study and was classified into three categories (neurologic complications, contrast-induced allergy, and wound complications).
resultsThe mean age was 57.7±13.2 years old and the female was dominant at 63.9%. The overall complication rate was 5% (n=20/407). Regarding neurologic complications, the presence of malignancy (p<0.01), and a longer procedure time (>15 minutes, p=0.04) were statistically significant factors. Contrast-induced allergy did not show any statistically significant difference in any parameter. The wound complication rate was higher in men (p=0.02), trans-femoral approach (p=0.02), frequent alcohol drinkers (p=0.04), those taking anticoagulants (p=0.03), and longer procedure time (>15 minutes, p<0.01).
conclusionsDSA is an invasive diagnostic modality and can cause several complications. Patients with cancer should be more careful about the occurrence of cerebral infarction, and men taking anticoagulants or drinking frequently should be more careful about the occurrence of angio-site hematomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.