Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153749›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2022

Medication reviews and deprescribing as a single intervention in falls prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lotta J Seppala, Nellie Kamkar, Eveline P van Poelgeest, Katja Thomsen, Joost G Daams, Jesper Ryg, Tahir Masud, Manuel Montero-Odasso, Sirpa Hartikainen, Mirko Petrovic and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Implementing pharmacist-led home medicines reviews within fracture liaison services for better post-fracture care: a qualitative study of patient and practitioner experience.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Lotta J SeppalaAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9197-1424
Nellie KamkarGait and Brain Laboratory, Lawson Research Health Institute, Parkwood Hospital, London Ontario, Canada.
Eveline P van PoelgeestAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katja ThomsenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Joost G DaamsResearch Support, Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jesper RygDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-3062
Tahir MasudNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Manuel Montero-OdassoGait and Brain Laboratory, Lawson Research Health Institute, Parkwood Hospital, London Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5796-2361
Sirpa HartikainenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mirko PetrovicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics (Section of Geriatrics), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nathalie van der VeldeAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKWestern University · CAGhent University · BENottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lona Mody, RAYMOND L YUNG · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
CIHR MOP 211220CIHR PTJ 153100NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundour aim was to assess the effectiveness of medication review and deprescribing interventions as a single intervention in falls prevention.

methods

designsystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO until 28 March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: randomised controlled trials of older participants comparing any medication review or deprescribing intervention with usual care and reporting falls as an outcome. STUDY RECORDS: title/abstract and full-text screening by two reviewers. RISK OF BIAS: Cochrane Collaboration revised tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: results reported separately for different settings and sufficiently comparable studies meta-analysed.

resultsforty-nine heterogeneous studies were included. COMMUNITY: meta-analyses of medication reviews resulted in a risk ratio (RR) of 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.29, I2 = 0%, 3 studies(s)) for number of fallers, in an RR = 0.95 (0.70-1.27, I2 = 37%, 3 s) for number of injurious fallers and in a rate ratio (RaR) of 0.89 (0.69-1.14, I2 = 0%, 2 s) for injurious falls. HOSPITAL: meta-analyses assessing medication reviews resulted in an RR = 0.97 (0.74-1.28, I2 = 15%, 2 s) and in an RR = 0.50 (0.07-3.50, I2 = 72% %, 2 s) for number of fallers after and during admission, respectively. LONG-TERM CARE: meta-analyses investigating medication reviews or deprescribing plans resulted in an RR = 0.86 (0.72-1.02, I2 = 0%, 5 s) for number of fallers and in an RaR = 0.93 (0.64-1.35, I2 = 92%, 7 s) for number of falls.

conclusionsthe heterogeneity of the interventions precluded us to estimate the exact effect of medication review and deprescribing as a single intervention. For future studies, more comparability is warranted. These interventions should not be implemented as a stand-alone strategy in falls prevention but included in multimodal strategies due to the multifactorial nature of falls.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020218231.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsExerciseHospitalsHumansMedication Reviewaccidental fallsdeprescribingfall-risk-increasing drugsmedication reviewolder peoplesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36153749
PMCPMC9509688
OpenAlexW4297145417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.