Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153625›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Effects of intravenous lidocaine on hypoxemia induced by propofol-based sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Xiu-Ru Qi, Jing-Yi Sun, Li-Xin An, Ke Zhang, Fu-Shan Xue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05944887 (Does Intravenous Lidocaine Reduce Propofol Consumption and the Side Effects of Sedation During Gastroscopy in ASA 1 and 2 Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05944887 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Does Intravenous Lidocaine Reduce Propofol Consumption and the Side Effects of Sedation During Gastroscopy in ASA 1 and 2 Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled46ConditionsDiagnostic GastroscopyArmsLidocaine 2% Injectable Solution, Saline administration as placebo, Propofol injection, gastroscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiu-Ru Qi *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing-Yi Sun *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li-Xin AnDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. anlixin8120@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-4010
Ke ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fu-Shan XueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxygen-desaturation episodes, blood pressure drops, and involuntary body movement are common problems that occur in propofol-based sedation in the procedure of painless gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. As a widely used analgesic adjuvant, intravenous lidocaine can reduce the consumption of propofol during ERCP or colonoscopy. However, it is still unknown how lidocaine affects the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes and cardiovascular events, and involuntary movement during painless GI endoscopy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravenous lidocaine in propofol-based sedation for GI endoscopy.

methodsWe will conduct a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, saline-controlled trial. A total number of 300 patients undergoing painless GI procedures will be enrolled and randomly divided into the lidocaine group (Group L) and the control group (Group C). After midazolam and sufentanil intravenous injection, a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine was immediately injected and followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg/kg/h in the lidocaine group, whereas the same volumes of saline solution in the control group. Then, propofol was titrated to produce unconsciousness during the procedure. The primary outcome will be the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of involuntary body movement, discomfort symptoms, propofol consumption, endoscopist, and patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Propofol-based deep sedation without intubation is widely used in painless GI endoscopy. However, adverse events such as hypoxemia often occur clinically. We expect to assess the effect of lidocaine on reducing the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes, cardiovascular events, and involuntary body movement. We believe that the results of this trial will provide an effective and safe method for painless GI endoscopy.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100053818. Registered on 30 November 2021.

Indexed as

HypotensionPropofolEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansHypoxiaLidocaineMidazolamOxygenProcedural SedationProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline SolutionSufentanilLidocaineMidazolamOxygenPropofolSaline SolutionSufentanilHypoxemiaLidocainePainless gastrointestinal endoscopyPropofolSedation

Identifiers

PMID36153625
PMCPMC9509543
OpenAlexW4296949355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.