ArticleImplementation science communications2022
The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing unmet need for substance use disorder treatment among youth in the legal system (YLS): Costs of structured implementation interventions with juvenile justice agencies in seven states.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025Trial
- Cost analysis of implementing a community health worker-led weight reduction randomized-controlled trial among prediabetic south asian patients at primary care sites in NYC.Implementation science : IS · 2025Trial
- Integrating health economics and implementation science: a call to action.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Reimbursement Potential of Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) Billing Codes for Opioid Use Disorder Co-Occurring with Mental Disorders: Descriptive Estimates from a Pragmatic Trial.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Applying FRAME-IS to characterize provider-led adaptations to a cervical cancer prevention intervention in Kenya.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions: Where Are We Now and What Is Next?Annual review of psychology · 2026Review
- SmUDo (Smart Unit-Dose): Redefining efficiency, quality, and staffing strategies for optimized processes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development and usability testing of a tool to estimate the budget impact of implementing a smoking cessation intervention for cancer patients.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD): protocol of a pilot randomized trial to enhance the impact of an evidence-based intervention for youth.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Mapping the future: The current landscape and future directions of evidence-based practice in Saudi radiology departments.PloS one · 2025Article
- Using community engagement withContemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Budget impact analysis for implementation decision making, planning, and financing.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Implementing interventions to start HPV vaccination at age 9: Using the evidence we have.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Cost of Implementing an Evidence-Based Intervention to Support Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptations are common and necessary to maximizing the marginal impact of EBPs, little attention has been given to the economic consequences and how adaptations affect marginal costs. DISCUSSION: In assessing the economic consequences of adaptation, one should consider its impact on core components, the planned adaptive periphery, and the unplanned adaptive periphery. Guided by implementation science frameworks, we examine how various economic evaluation approaches accommodate the influence of adaptations and discuss the pros and cons of these approaches. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), mixed methods can elucidate the economic reasons driving the adaptations. Micro-costing approaches are applied in research that integrates the adaptation of EBPs at the planning stage using innovative, adaptive study designs. In contrast, evaluation of unplanned adaptation is subject to confounding and requires sensitivity analysis to address unobservable measures and other uncertainties. A case study is presented using the RE-AIM framework to illustrate the costing of adaptations. In addition to empirical approaches to evaluating adaptation, simulation modeling approaches can be used to overcome limited follow-up in implementation studies.
conclusionsAs implementation science evolves to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and implications of adaptations, it is increasingly important to understand the economic implications of such adaptations, in addition to their impact on clinical effectiveness. Therefore, explicit consideration is warranted of how costs can be evaluated as outcomes of adaptations to the delivery of EBPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.