Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153568›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2022

Gait parameters when walking with or without rollator on different surface characteristics: a pilot study among healthy individuals.

Eva Ekvall Hansson, Yara Akar, Tingting Liu, Cong Wang, Agneta Malmgren Fänge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva Ekvall HanssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Human Movement: Health and Rehabilitation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. eva.ekvall-hansson@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-6486
Yara Akar *Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tingting Liu *Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cong Wang *Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Agneta Malmgren FängeDepartment of Health Sciences, Applied Gerontology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGait parameters can measure risks of falling and mortality and identify early stages of frailty. The use of walking aid changes gait parameters. The aim of this study was to describe differences in gait parameters among healthy adults when walking on different surfaces and under different conditions, with and without a rollator.

resultsTen healthy participants walked first without and then with a rollator upslope, downslope and on flat surface, on bitumen and gravel respectively. Step length, walking speed and sideway deviation was measured using an inertial measurement unit. Walking up a slope using a rollator generated the longest step length and walking down a slope using a rollator the shortest. Fastest walking speed was used when walking up a slope with rollator and slowest when walking down a slope with rollator. Sideway deviation was highest when walking down a slope and lowest when walking on gravel, both without rollator. Highest walk ratio was found when walk up a slope without rollator and lowest when walking down a slope with rollator. Data from this study provides valuable knowledge regarding gait parameters among healthy individuals, useful for future clinical research relevant for rehabilitation and public health.

Indexed as

GaitWalkersAdultHumansPilot ProjectsWalkingEnvironmental conditionGaitRollatorSideway deviationStep lengthWalking speed

Identifiers

PMID36153568
PMCPMC9509549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.