Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153564›Full record

ArticleCell & bioscience2022

Reliable assessment of telomere maintenance mechanisms in neuroblastoma.

Alina Meeser, Christoph Bartenhagen, Lisa Werr, Anna-Maria Hellmann, Yvonne Kahlert, Nadine Hemstedt, Peter Nürnberg, Janine Altmüller, Sandra Ackermann, Barbara Hero and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell & bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alina MeeserDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph BartenhagenDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Lisa WerrDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Anna-Maria HellmannDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Yvonne KahlertDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Nadine HemstedtDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Peter NürnbergCenter for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Janine AltmüllerCologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sandra AckermannDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Barbara HeroDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten SimonDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin PeiferCenter for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthias FischerDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. matthias.fischer@uk-koeln.de.
Carolina RosswogDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. carolina.rosswog@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-6198
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZX1303Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZX1307Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZX1603Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZX1607Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft as part of the SFB1399Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BA 6984/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FI 1926/2-1Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung 2016-Kolleg-19Universität zu Köln Köln Fortune Program/Faculty of Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM) are a hallmark of high-risk neuroblastoma, and are conferred by activation of telomerase or alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). However, detection of TMM is not yet part of the clinical routine, and consensus on TMM detection, especially on ALT assessment, remains to be achieved.

methodsWhole genome sequencing (WGS) data of 68 primary neuroblastoma samples were analyzed. Telomere length was calculated from WGS data or by telomere restriction fragment analysis (n = 39). ALT was assessed by C-circle assay (CCA, n = 67) and detection of ALT-associated PML nuclear bodies (APB) by combined fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence staining (n = 68). RNA sequencing was performed (n = 64) to determine expression of TERT and telomeric long non-coding RNA (TERRA). Telomerase activity was examined by telomerase repeat amplification protocol (TRAP, n = 15).

resultsTumors were considered as telomerase-positive if they harbored a TERT rearrangement, MYCN amplification or high TERT expression (45.6%, 31/68), and ALT-positive if they were positive for APB and CCA (19.1%, 13/68). If all these markers were absent, tumors were considered TMM-negative (25.0%, 17/68). According to these criteria, the majority of samples were classified unambiguously (89.7%, 61/68). Assessment of additional ALT-associated parameters clarified the TMM status of the remaining seven cases with high likelihood: ALT-positive tumors had higher TERRA expression, longer telomeres, more telomere insertions, a characteristic pattern of telomere variant repeats, and were associated with ATRX mutations.

conclusionsWe here propose a workflow to reliably detect TMM in neuroblastoma. We show that unambiguous classification is feasible following a stepwise approach that determines both, activation of telomerase and ALT. The workflow proposed in this study can be used in clinical routine and provides a framework to systematically and reliably determine telomere maintenance mechanisms for risk stratification and treatment allocation of neuroblastoma patients.

Indexed as

Alternative lengthening of telomeresNeuroblastomaTelomeraseTelomere maintenance

Identifiers

PMID36153564
PMCPMC9508734
OpenAlexW4296982672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.