Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153550›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2022

Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study.

Judy Munday, David Sturgess, Sabrina Oishi, Jess Bendeich, Allison Kearney, Clint Douglas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Judy MundayCentre for Healthcare Transformation & School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT) and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. judy.munday@qut.edu.au.
David SturgessThe University of Queensland (UQ) and Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sabrina OishiDepartment of Anaesthetics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jess BendeichPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Allison KearneyDepartment of Anaesthetics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Clint DouglasCentre for Healthcare Transformation & School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT) and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Princess Alexandra Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous body temperature monitoring during perioperative care is enabled by using a non-invasive "zero-heat-flux" (ZHF) device. However, rigorous evaluation of whether continuous monitoring capability improves process of care and patient outcomes is lacking. This study assessed the feasibility of a large-scale trial on the impact of continuous ZHF monitoring on perioperative temperature management practices and hypothermia prevention.

methodsA feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Participants included patients undergoing elective surgery under neuraxial or general anesthesia, and perioperative nurses and anesthetists caring for patient participants. Eighty-two patients pre and post introduction of the ZHF device were enrolled. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, missing data or device failure, and staff evaluation of intervention feasibility and acceptability. Process of care outcomes included temperature monitoring practices, warming interventions and perioperative hypothermia.

resultsThere were no adverse events related to the device and feasibility of recruitment was high (60%). Treatment adherence varied across the perioperative pathway (43 to 93%) and missing data due to electronic transfer issues were identified. Provision of ZHF monitoring had most impact on monitoring practices in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit; the impact on intraoperative monitoring practices was minimal.

conclusionsEnhancements to the design of the ZHF device, particularly for improved data retention and transfer, would be beneficial prior to a large-scale evaluation of whether continuous temperature monitoring will improve patient outcomes. Implementation research designs are needed for future work to improve the complex area of temperature monitoring during surgery.  

trial registrationProspective registration prior to patient enrolment was obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 16

Indexed as

Continuous monitoringFeasibilityTemperatureThermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID36153550
PMCPMC9509652
OpenAlexW4296935252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.