Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153481›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Development and pilot implementation of guidelines for culturally tailored research recruitment materials for African Americans and Latinos.

Jennifer Cunningham-Erves, Sheila V Kusnoor, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Sarah C Stallings, Jabari S Ichimura, Tiffany L Israel, Paul A Harris, Consuelo H Wilkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized Comparison of Online Motivational Themes in Clinical Trial Recruitment.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Amyloid PET and clinical management in a diverse, cognitively impaired population: The New IDEAS Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Closing the Gap: Enhancing Diversity in Rehabilitation Trials.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Insights from the trial innovation network's initial consultation process.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer Cunningham-ErvesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 Dr. D. B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN, USA. jerves@mmc.edu.
Sheila V KusnoorCenter for Knowledge Management, Strategy and Innovation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Victoria Villalta-GilMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah C StallingsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jabari S IchimuraDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tiffany L IsraelVanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Nashville, TN, USA.
Paul A HarrisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Consuelo H WilkinsDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Improving Clinical trial Education, Recruitment, and Enrollment at CTSA Hubs (I-CERCH) - HEAL SupplementU24TR001579 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HARRIS, PAUL A., WILKINS, CONSUELO HOPKINS · 2016 to 2022
$34.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR001579NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies support cultural tailoring of recruitment materials as a strategy to promote the enrollment of minoritized groups in clinical trials. However, there is a lack of guidance for research teams to create culturally tailored materials, potentially contributing to low recruitment rates of minoritized groups. We describe the development and pilot testing of recruitment material guidelines used to culturally tailor clinical trial recruitment materials targeting African Americans and Latinos.

methodsThe guideline development team consisted of investigators, research staff, and community leaders and members experienced in the recruitment and community engagement of minoritized groups. The recruitment material guidelines were developed using the literature, focus groups with African Americans and Latinos, the teams' research experience, and guidance from a community advisory board. To assess the effectiveness of the guidelines, a pilot study was conducted comparing advertisement click-through rates and enrollment outcomes between two institutions differing in use of culturally tailored versus non-tailored Facebook banner ads for the "Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness" (ADAPTABLE) study.

resultsFive themes emerged from focus groups: (1) employ diversity and inclusion in recruitment efforts; (2) access multiple recruitment channels to increase reach and possible participation; (3) increase your "footwork"; (4) personalize outreach and recruitment to specific groups' beliefs and values; (5) align recruitment messaging with language preferences and motivations for study participation; and (6) specify incentives for participation. Guidelines were: 1) be inclusive; 2) use all forms of media; 3) take a personalized approach; 4) align recruitment messaging with motivations for study participation; 5) specify incentives; and 6) get out into the community. Additional guidelines were developed addressing specific considerations for images and language when targeting African American and Latino populations. Pilot study results demonstrated that clicks per impression ratio (0.47 clicks per impression vs. 0.03 clicks per impression) and the percentage of African American enrollment were significantly higher when using tailored compared to non-tailored ads (12.8% vs. 8.3%, respectively).

conclusionThe recruitment material guidelines offer practical recommendations to reach diverse populations for clinical trial participation more effectively. Our preliminary data supports use of these guidelines as a strategy to enhance recruitment of minoritized groups into clinical research studies.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHispanic or LatinoAspirinClinical Trials as TopicFocus GroupsHumansPilot ProjectsAspirinClinical trialsCultural tailoringMinoritized recruitmentParticipant enrollment

Identifiers

PMID36153481
PMCPMC9508728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.