ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2023
Discussing sexual health among Flemish patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexual dysfunction in movement disorders: prevalence, clinical features, associated factors and management.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026Review
- Sexual health in patient care: shortcomings in medical training and experienced barriers in sexual history taking.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Optimizing sexuality of young women with breast cancer: how can the breast clinic help?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeParkinson's disease (PD) can lead to sexual dysfunction. Yet, studies have shown that neurologists do not often discuss possible sexual health consequences with their patients. Thus, in this study, we investigated the communication on sexual health between healthcare workers and PD patients in Flanders, Belgium.
methodsThrough an online survey, PD patients were contacted. Sexual dysfunction was measured with the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX), stage of PD with the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and self-made questions on the communication between healthcare workers and PD patients.
resultsIn total, 100 PD patients responded, of which 23% had possible sexual dysfunction. Of these respondents, 60% had never received any information about possible sexual health consequences. More than half (58%) of the patients felt their neurologist should provide information on possible sexual health consequences, though only 14% had ever received information from their neurologist. Male respondents expressed a greater need for information than female respondents (p = .049), although no difference between both groups in receiving information was found (p = .294). In addition, low to middle educated people generally received more information than higher educated people (p = .018).. The more severe the disease is, as measured by the Hoehn and Yahr scale, the more information a patient receives (p = .012). The most frequently mentioned barriers in discussing sexual health are a lack of initiative by the neurologist (41%) and awkwardness to discuss sexuality (41%).
conclusionThis study showed that PD patients expect information from neurologists on possible sexual health consequences, but seldom receive information. More attention should be given to training neurologists in discussing sexual health. Table 1 Characteristics of the sample (N = 100) N % Gender Male 59 59 Female 41 41 Education level Lower 4 4 Middle 42 42 Higher 54 54 Relationship status No partner 10 10 Partner 90 90 Stage of Parkinson (Hoehn & Yahr scale) Stage 0 3 3 Stage 1 36 36 Stage 1.5 12 12 Stage 2 9 9 Stage 2.5 6 6 Stage 3 21 21 Stage 4 9 9 Stage 5 4 4 Time since diagnosis Less than 1 years ago 10 10 1-2 years 13 13 2-5 years 32 32 5-10 years 29 29 Longer than 20 years 13 13 10-15 years 2 2 15-20 years 1 1 Received information on sexual health consequences from… Treating neurologist 14 14 GP 9 9 Geriater 0 0 Nurses 2 2 Psychotherapist 3 3 Sexuologist 1 1 Kinesitherapist 2 2 Other 4 4 Who do you think should provide you information on sexual health consequences Treating neurologist 58 58 GP 43 43 Geriater 3 3 Nurses 6 6 Psychotherapist 23 23 Sexuologist 17 17 Kinesitherapist 3 3 Other 2 2 How would you like to receive information on possible sexual health consequences? Brochure 38 38 Online (e.g. website) 38 38 Posters in waiting room 3 3 Personal conversation with healthcare worker 51 51 Other 1 1 From what moment do you think possible sexual health consequences of Parkinson's disease should be discussed? From the moment of diagnosis 52 52 From moment patient indicates he/she experiences problems 33 33 From moment that the neurologist feels it should be discussed 9 9 Should not be discussed 6 6 Need for information on possible sexual health consequences No need 31 31 A little need 19 19 Some need 21 21 Need 24 24 A lot of need 5 5 How often has healthcare personnel given you information on sexual health consequences Never 60 60 Seldom 25 25 Sometimes 12 12 Regularly 3 3 At every consultation 0 0 ASEX No possible sexual dysfunction 77 77 Possible Sexual dysfunction (score equal to or higher than 19) 23 23 How important are sexual activities for you? Not important 20 20 Slightly important 33 33 Somewhat important 22 22 Important 18 18 Very important 7 7 I avoid sexual contact because of my disease Agree completely 8 8 Agree 16 16 Agree somewhat 30 30 Disagree 28 28 Completely disagree 18 18 I feel unsatisfied with my sex life due to my disease Agree completely 16 16 Agree 22 22 Agree somewhat 32 32 Disagree 20 20 Completely disagree 10 10 Mean Standard deviation Age 66.97 8.88 ASEX 16.02 4.53 Table 2 Associations of ASEX, need for information, receiving information ASEX p Need for information p Receiving information p Gender Male 16.08 0.948 55.31 0.049 48.69 0.294 Female 16.11 44.13 43.38 Education level Low-middle 15.83 0.068 53.26 0.356 53.41 0.018 High 16.20 48.06 41.49 Need for information and receiving information scores are mean ranks due to non-parametric tests ASEX scores are means Table 3 Correlations between variables ASEX Age Need for information Receiving information Hoehn and Yahr Importance of sex life Avoiding sex Unsatisfied with sex life ASEX - - 0.04 0.27* 0.07 - 0.09 - 0.12 - 0.10 - 0.23* Age - - 0.20 0.10 0.41*** - 0.28** - 0.16 0.08 Need for information - 0.14 - 0.11 0.38*** - 0.13 - 0.46*** Receiving information - 0.22* - 0.03 - 0.08 - 0.08 Hoehn and Yahr - - 0.17 - 0.32** - 0.17 Importance of sex life - 0.24* - 0.07 Avoiding sex - 0.48*** Unsatisfied with sex life -
Indexed as
Identifiers
36153464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.