Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153446›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2022

Machine learning classification of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in NSCLC: a multicentre study in a Western European patient population.

Sara S A Laros, Dennis Dieckens, Stephan P Blazis, Johannes A van der Heide

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  8. The value ofTzu chi medical journal
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sara S A LarosDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Afdeling Klinische Fysica - Medische Techniek, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. s.s.a.laros@asz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-3206
Dennis DieckensDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-5116
Stephan P BlazisDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Afdeling Klinische Fysica - Medische Techniek, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-4012
Johannes A van der HeideDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background[

methodsWe retrospectively selected lung cancer patients who underwent PET-CT for initial staging in two centres in the Netherlands. The primary tumour and suspected lymph node metastases were annotated and cross-referenced with pathology results. Lymph nodes were classified as malignant or benign. From the image data, we extracted radiomic features and trained the classifier model using the extreme gradient boost (XGB) algorithm. Various scenarios were defined by selecting different combinations of data input and clinical features. Data from centre 1 were used for training and validation of the models using the XGB algorithm. To determine the performance of the model in a different hospital, the XGB model was tested using data from centre 2.

resultsAdding primary tumour data resulted in a significant gain in the performance of the trained classifier model. Adding the clinical information about distant metastases did not lead to significant improvement. The performance of the model in the test set (centre 2) was slightly but statistically significantly lower than in the validation set (centre 1).

conclusionsUsing the XGB algorithm potentially leads to an improved model for the classification of intrathoracic lymph nodes. The inclusion of primary tumour data improved the performance of the model, while additional knowledge of distant metastases did not. In patients in whom metastases are limited to lymph nodes in the thorax, this may reduce costly and invasive procedures such as endobronchial ultrasound or mediastinoscopy procedures.

Indexed as

Intrathoracic lymph nodesLung cancerMachine learningPET-CTRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID36153446
PMCPMC9509500
OpenAlexW4296946216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.