Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

State space methods for phase amplitude coupling analysis.

Hugo Soulat, Emily P Stephen, Amanda M Beck, Patrick L Purdon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Adaptable Phase-Tracking System for Parkinsonian Rest Tremor: Design and In-Clinic Feasibility.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Multilevel State-Space Models Enable High Precision Event Related Potential Analysis.Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hugo SoulatDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Emily P StephenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Amanda M BeckDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Patrick L PurdonDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. patrick.purdon@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Project 4: Mathematical Modeling Studies of Anesthetic ActionP01GM118269 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KOPELL, NANCY · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
Noninvasive Low-cost Biomarkers for Preclinical Diagnosis and Longitudinal Tracking of Alzheimer's Disease Using Sleep and Resting State EEGR01AG054081 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, PRERAU, MICHAEL J · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
The Aging Brain Under General Anesthesia: Neurophysiology, Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Aging and Alzheimer's Disease, and Post-Operative Cognitive OutcomesR01AG056015 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, PURDON, PATRICK L. · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
A pilot study to characterize brain dynamic biomarkers of fentanyl for opioid overdose monitoringR21DA048323 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PURDON, PATRICK L. · 2019 to 2020
$462k
NIH HHS P01GM118269NIH HHS R01AG054081NIH HHS R01AG056015NIH HHS R21DA048323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase amplitude coupling (PAC) is thought to play a fundamental role in the dynamic coordination of brain circuits and systems. There are however growing concerns that existing methods for PAC analysis are prone to error and misinterpretation. Improper frequency band selection can render true PAC undetectable, while non-linearities or abrupt changes in the signal can produce spurious PAC. Current methods require large amounts of data and lack formal statistical inference tools. We describe here a novel approach for PAC analysis that substantially addresses these problems. We use a state space model to estimate the component oscillations, avoiding problems with frequency band selection, nonlinearities, and sharp signal transitions. We represent cross-frequency coupling in parametric and time-varying forms to further improve statistical efficiency and estimate the posterior distribution of the coupling parameters to derive their credible intervals. We demonstrate the method using simulated data, rat local field potentials (LFP) data, and human EEG data.

Indexed as

BrainAnimalsElectroencephalographyHumansRats

Identifiers

PMID36153353
PMCPMC9509338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.