Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153344›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Integrated graph measures reveal survival likelihood for buildings in wildfire events.

Akshat Chulahwat, Hussam Mahmoud, Santiago Monedero, Francisco Jośe Diez Vizcaíno, Joaquin Ramirez, David Buckley, Adrián Cardil Forradellas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal interventions to curb urban conflagration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akshat ChulahwatDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Colorado, CO, 80523, USA.
Hussam MahmoudDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Colorado, CO, 80523, USA. Hussam.Mahmoud@colostate.edu.
Santiago MonederoTechnosylva Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.
Francisco Jośe Diez VizcaínoTechnosylva Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.
Joaquin RamirezTechnosylva Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.
David BuckleyTechnosylva Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.
Adrián Cardil ForradellasTechnosylva Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

NIST DOC 70NANB15H044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfire events have resulted in unprecedented social and economic losses worldwide in the last few years. Most studies on reducing wildfire risk to communities focused on modeling wildfire behavior in the wildland to aid in developing fuel reduction and fire suppression strategies. However, minimizing losses in communities and managing risk requires a holistic approach to understanding wildfire behavior that fully integrates the wildland's characteristics and the built environment's features. This complete integration is particularly critical for intermixed communities where the wildland and the built environment coalesce. Community-level wildfire behavior that captures the interaction between the wildland and the built environment, which is necessary for predicting structural damage, has not received sufficient attention. Predicting damage to the built environment is essential in understanding and developing fire mitigation strategies to make communities more resilient to wildfire events. In this study, we use integrated concepts from graph theory to establish a relative vulnerability metric capable of quantifying the survival likelihood of individual buildings within a wildfire-affected region. We test the framework by emulating the damage observed in the historic 2018 Camp Fire and the 2020 Glass Fire. We propose two formulations based on graph centralities to evaluate the vulnerability of buildings relative to each other. We then utilize the relative vulnerability values to determine the damage state of individual buildings. Based on a one-to-one comparison of the calculated and observed damages, the maximum predicted building survival accuracy for the two formulations ranged from [Formula: see text] for the historical wildfires tested. From the results, we observe that the modified random walk formulation can better identify nodes that lie at the extremes on the vulnerability scale. In contrast, the modified degree formulation provides better predictions for nodes with mid-range vulnerability values.

Indexed as

FiresWildfiresConservation of Natural ResourcesProbabilityRisk Management

Identifiers

PMID36153344
PMCPMC9509321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.