Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153237›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2023

Willingness to pay for COVID-19 vaccines: Applying the health belief model.

Rasha M Arabyat, Mohammad B Nusair, Sayer I Al-Azzam, Haneen A Amawi, Feras Darwish El-Hajji

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rasha M ArabyatDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, P. O. BOX 566, Jordan. Electronic address: rasha.arabyat@yu.edu.jo.
Mohammad B NusairDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, P. O. BOX 566, Jordan; Department of Sociobehavioral and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Sayer I Al-AzzamDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.
Haneen A AmawiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, P. O. BOX 566, Jordan.
Feras Darwish El-HajjiApplied Science Private University Amman, Jordan.
Yarmouk University · JOApplied Science Private University · JOJordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, there is no effective treatment for COVID-19. Vaccines are effective and safe strategies to control the pandemic.

objectiveTo measure consumers' maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for COVID-19 vaccines in Jordan and to identify the predictors of WTP.

methodAn online survey was used to collect data related to sociodemographic factors and constructs from the Health Belief Model (HBM). The contingent valuation method using the payment card approach was used, whereby the respondents were asked to choose their maximum WTP value from a range of 5-200 Jordanian Dinar (JOD). The maximum WTP values were then categorized into several groups, and an ordered logistic model was used to generate adjusted odds ratios and estimate the significant predictors of maximum WTP.

resultsA total of 3116 respondents completed the survey. More than half of the sample were not willing to pay out of pocket for the vaccine (57%). Among the respondents who were willing to pay any amount above zero, the mean maximum WTP was 28.1 JOD (39.63 USD), and the median WTP was 20 JOD (28.21 USD). The significant predictors of higher WTP values were being of younger age, higher income, being a healthcare provider, having one or more chronic diseases, previous history of receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine, having a family member/friend who has died from the COVID-19, lower perceived risk of the vaccine, higher perceived benefits of the vaccine, and having been recommended to get the vaccine.

conclusionIt is recommended to continue providing the vaccine free of charge to increase its uptake. Educational campaigns should focus on refuting myths related to the vaccine and promoting the benefits of receiving the vaccine in slowing the spread of the pandemic, and improving the economy. Healthcare providers' recommendations have the potential to increase WTP for the vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Belief ModelHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccineHealth Belief ModelWillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID36153237
PMCPMC9472461
OpenAlexW4296906208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.