Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36153231›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2022

Can neuropsychological testing be improved with model-based approaches?

Roger Ratcliff, Gail McKoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roger RatcliffThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: ratcliff.22@osu.edu.
Gail McKoonThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Toward using comprehensive decision-making models in neuropsychological testingR01AG041176 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2012 to 2021
$3.8M
Decision Making on Continuous Scales in Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseR01AG057841 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041176NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been little impact of cognitive psychology and modeling on neuropsychological testing for over 50 years. There is also a disconnect between those tests and the constructs they are said to measure. We discuss studies at the interface between testing and modeling that illustrate the opportunity for advances.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsHumanscognitive modelingneuropsychological testingresponse time

Identifiers

PMID36153231
PMCPMC9667530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.