Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152957›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2022

Improved survival in intensive care unit in severe COVID-19 associated with amantadine use - retrospective study.

Daniel Chober, Zenon Czajkowski, Bogusz Aksak-Wąs, Katarzyna Dalewska-Kucharczyk, Katarzyna Hołubczak, Sylwia Karasińska-Milchert, Mateusz Jaremko, Miłosz Skowron, Malwina Karasińska-Cieślak, Miłosz Parczewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Redesign of the Molecular Scaffold of Viral Ion Channel Blockers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel ChoberPomeranian Medical University, Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Szczecin, Poland. Electronic address: Daniel.Chober@pum.edu.pl.
Zenon CzajkowskiRegional Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Szczecin, Poland.
Bogusz Aksak-WąsPomeranian Medical University, Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Szczecin, Poland.
Katarzyna Dalewska-KucharczykRegional Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Szczecin, Poland.
Katarzyna HołubczakRegional Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Szczecin, Poland.
Sylwia Karasińska-MilchertRegional Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Szczecin, Poland.
Mateusz JaremkoRegional Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Szczecin, Poland.
Miłosz SkowronRegional Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Szczecin, Poland.
Malwina Karasińska-CieślakPomeranian Medical University, Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Szczecin, Poland.
Miłosz ParczewskiPomeranian Medical University, Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Szczecin, Poland.
University of Szczecin · PLPomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPossible immunomodulatory effect of amantadine in patients treated in intensive care unit (ICU), mostly among patients with brain injuries or vascular diseases was observed in several studies. The potential antiviral effect of amantadine against SARS-CoV-2 was discarded in clinical trials; however, immunomodulatory potential was not studied. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of immunomodulatory amantadine therapy on mortality in patients with respiratory insufficiency due to COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation in ICU.

methodsRetrospective analysis of 241 cases of 141 (58.5%) receiving intravenous amantadine sulfate vs 100 (41.5%) controls on standard of care only was performed.

resultsOverall mortality was 72.6%, being notably lower among amantadine treated patients (59.5%, n = 84) compared with controls (91%, n = 91), P-value = 0.001. In multivariate models administration of amantadine was independently associated with lower mortality rate (hazard ratio: 0.220, CI: 0.146-0.333 P-value = 0.001). Furthermore, survival was improved in patients who received amantadine; late administration of amantadine after 5th day was independently associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio: 0.560, CI: 0.313-0.999, P-value = 0.050).

conclusionIn patients treated in ICU with severe respiratory failure, administration of amantadine is associated with lower mortality, which may be associated with the potential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of this agent.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentRespiratory InsufficiencyAmantadineHumansIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2AmantadineAmantadineARDSCOVID-19ICUMortality

Identifiers

PMID36152957
PMCPMC9490956
OpenAlexW4297458749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.