Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152674›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Microbe2022

Causal discovery for the microbiome.

Jukka Corander, William P Hanage, Johan Pensar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Microbe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing the health of the gut microbial organ: why and how?The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Article
  16. The lung microbiome in interstitial lung disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Characterising functional redundancy in microbiome communities via relative entropy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Jukka CoranderDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Parasites and Microbes, The Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK; Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: jukka.corander@medisin.uio.no.
William P HanageCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: whanage@hsph.harvard.edu.
Johan PensarDepartment of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · USUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Understanding and controlling antibiotic resistanceU54GM088558 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LIPSITCH, MARC · 2009 to 2018
$26.4M
Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases and BiodefenseT32AI007535 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI GRAD, YONATAN H, MURRAY, MEGAN B · 1998 to 2025
$4.8M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007535NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement and manipulation of the microbiome is generally considered to have great potential for understanding the causes of complex diseases in humans, developing new therapies, and finding preventive measures. Many studies have found significant associations between the microbiome and various diseases; however, Koch's classical postulates remind us about the importance of causative reasoning when considering the relationship between microbes and a disease manifestation. Although causal discovery in observational microbiome data faces many challenges, methodological advances in causal structure learning have improved the potential of data-driven prediction of causal effects in large-scale biological systems. In this Personal View, we show the capability of existing methods for inferring causal effects from metagenomic data, and we highlight ways in which the introduction of causal structures that are more flexible than existing structures offers new opportunities for causal reasoning. Our observations suggest that microbiome research can further benefit from tools developed in the past 5 years in causal discovery and learn from their applications elsewhere.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaCausalityHumansMetagenomeMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID36152674
PMCPMC9680137
OpenAlexW4296578127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.