Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152671›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2023

Protection against omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.2 reinfection conferred by primary omicron BA.1 or pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection among health-care workers with and without mRNA vaccination: a test-negative case-control study.

Sara Carazo, Danuta M Skowronski, Marc Brisson, Sapha Barkati, Chantal Sauvageau, Nicholas Brousseau, Rodica Gilca, Judith Fafard, Denis Talbot, Manale Ouakki and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Economic evaluation of wastewater surveillance in Ontario, Canada, using COVID-19 as a case study.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2026
    Article
  9. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination and Prior Infections to Reduce Long COVID Risk During the Pre-Omicron and Omicron Periods.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels in a Cohort of Health Care Workers Before and After the Omicron Wave in Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sara CarazoBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. Electronic address: sara.carazo@inspq.qc.ca.
Danuta M SkowronskiCommunicable Diseases and Immunization Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marc BrissonSocial and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Sapha BarkatiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Chantal SauvageauBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Nicholas BrousseauBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Rodica GilcaBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Judith FafardLaboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Denis TalbotSocial and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Manale OuakkiBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Vladimir GilcaBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Alex CarignanDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Sherbrook University, Sherbrook, QC, Canada.
Geneviève DeceuninckCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Philippe De WalsBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Gaston De SerresBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of data on vaccine-induced or infection-induced (hybrid or natural) immunity against omicron (B.1.1.529) subvariant BA.2, particularly in comparing the effects of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection with the same or different genetic lineage. We aimed to estimate the protection against omicron BA.2 associated with previous primary infection with omicron BA.1 or pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2, among health-care workers with and without mRNA vaccination.

methodsWe conducted a test-negative case-control study among health-care workers aged 18 years or older who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Quebec, Canada, between March 27 and June 4, 2022, when BA.2 was the predominant variant and was presumptively diagnosed with a positive test result. We identified cases (positive test during study period) and controls (negative test during study period) using the provincial laboratory database that records all nucleic acid amplification testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Quebec, and used the provincial immunisation registry to determine vaccination status. Logistic regression models compared the likelihood of BA.2 infection or reinfection (second positive test ≥30 days after primary infection) among health-care workers who had previous primary infection and none to three mRNA vaccine doses versus unvaccinated health-care workers with no primary infection.

findings258 007 SARS-CoV-2 tests were done during the study period. Among those with a valid result and that met the inclusion criteria, there were 37 732 presumed BA.2 cases (2521 [6·7%] reinfections following pre-omicron primary infection and 659 [1·7%] reinfections following BA.1 primary infection) and 73 507 controls (7360 [10·0%] had pre-omicron primary infection and 12 315 [16·8%] had BA.1 primary infection). Pre-omicron primary infection was associated with a 38% (95% CI 19-53) reduction in BA.2 infection risk, with higher BA.2 protection among those who had also received one (56%, 95% CI 47-63), two (69%, 64-73), or three (70%, 66-74) mRNA vaccine doses. Omicron BA.1 primary infection was associated with greater protection against BA.2 infection (risk reduction of 72%, 95% CI 65-78), and protection was increased further among those who had received two doses of mRNA vaccine (96%, 95-96), but was not improved with a third dose (96%, 95-97).

interpretationHealth-care workers who had received two doses of mRNA vaccine and had previous BA.1 infection were subsequently well protected for a prolonged period against BA.2 reinfection, with a third vaccine dose conferring no improvement to that hybrid protection. If this protection also pertains to future variants, there might be limited benefit from additional vaccine doses for people with hybrid immunity, depending on timing and variant.

fundingMinistère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec.

Indexed as

COVID-19Case-Control StudiesHumansReinfectionSARS-CoV-2Vaccination

Identifiers

PMID36152671
PMCPMC9491856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.