Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152650›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2022

Outcomes at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults in the USA: a follow-up surveillance study.

Ian Kracalik, Matthew E Oster, Karen R Broder, Margaret M Cortese, Maleeka Glover, Karen Shields, C Buddy Creech, Brittney Romanson, Shannon Novosad, Jonathan Soslow and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ian KracalikCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: nrm7@cdc.gov.
Matthew E OsterCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Karen R BroderCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Margaret M CorteseCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maleeka GloverCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Karen ShieldsCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C Buddy CreechVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Brittney RomansonCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shannon NovosadCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jonathan SoslowVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Emmanuel B WalterDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Paige MarquezCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jeffrey M DendyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jared WooCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Amy L ValderramaCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alejandra Ramirez-CardenasCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Agape AssefaCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M Jay CampbellDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
John R SuCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shelley S MagillCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David K ShayCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tom T ShimabukuroCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sridhar V BasavarajuCDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Myocarditis Outcomes After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Investigators and the CDC COVID-19 Response Team
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USDuke University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on medium-term outcomes in indivduals with myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination are scarce. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes and quality of life at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults.

methodsIn this follow-up surveillance study, we conducted surveys in US individuals aged 12-29 years with myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, for whom a report had been filed to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System between Jan 12 and Nov 5, 2021. A two-component survey was administered, one component to patients (or parents or guardians) and one component to health-care providers, to assess patient outcomes at least 90 days since myocarditis onset. Data collected were recovery status, cardiac testing, and functional status, and EuroQol health-related quality-of-life measures (dichotomised as no problems or any problems), and a weighted quality-of-life measure, ranging from 0 to 1 (full health). The EuroQol results were compared with published results in US populations (aged 18-24 years) from before and early on in the COVID-19 pandemic.

findingsBetween Aug 24, 2021, and Jan 12, 2022, we collected data for 519 (62%) of 836 eligible patients who were at least 90 days post-myocarditis onset: 126 patients via patient survey only, 162 patients via health-care provider survey only, and 231 patients via both surveys. Median patient age was 17 years (IQR 15-22); 457 (88%) patients were male and 61 (12%) were female. 320 (81%) of 393 patients with a health-care provider assessment were considered recovered from myocarditis by their health-care provider, although at the last health-care provider follow-up, 104 (26%) of 393 patients were prescribed daily medication related to myocarditis. Of 249 individuals who completed the quality-of-life portion of the patient survey, four (2%) reported problems with self-care, 13 (5%) with mobility, 49 (20%) with performing usual activities, 74 (30%) with pain, and 114 (46%) with depression. Mean weighted quality-of-life measure (0·91 [SD 0·13]) was similar to a pre-pandemic US population value (0·92 [0·13]) and significantly higher than an early pandemic US population value (0·75 [0·28]; p<0·0001). Most patients had improvements in cardiac diagnostic marker and testing data at follow-up, including normal or back-to-baseline troponin concentrations (181 [91%] of 200 patients with available data), echocardiograms (262 [94%] of 279 patients), electrocardiograms (240 [77%] of 311 patients), exercise stress testing (94 [90%] of 104 patients), and ambulatory rhythm monitoring (86 [90%] of 96 patients). An abnormality was noted among 81 (54%) of 151 patients with follow-up cardiac MRI; however, evidence of myocarditis suggested by the presence of both late gadolinium enhancement and oedema on cardiac MRI was uncommon (20 [13%] of 151 patients). At follow-up, most patients were cleared for all physical activity (268 [68%] of 393 patients).

interpretationAfter at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, most individuals in our cohort were considered recovered by health-care providers, and quality of life measures were comparable to those in pre-pandemic and early pandemic populations of a similar age. These findings might not be generalisable given the small sample size and further follow-up is needed for the subset of patients with atypical test results or not considered recovered.

fundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

COVID-19MyocarditisAdolescentContrast MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadoliniumHumansMalePandemicsQuality of LifeRNA, MessengerTroponinUnited StatesVaccinationContrast MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesGadoliniumRNA, MessengerTroponin

Identifiers

PMID36152650
PMCPMC9555956
OpenAlexW4296628382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.