ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2022
Uterine rupture with massive hemoperitoneum due to placenta percreta in a second trimester: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Midgestational Uterine Rupture With Spontaneous Bladder Disruption due to Placenta Percreta: A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Uterine Rupture in the First Trimester of Pregnancy Secondary to Placenta Accreta Spectrum.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Perforating invasive hydatidiform mole a catastrophe: A case report.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUterine rupture due to placenta percreta is very rare. It often occurs in patients with a history of Cesarean section. Quick diagnosis, management and intervention improves survival rate and decreases maternal and foetal morbidity. OBSERVATION: Patient, 36 years old, mother of three children delivered by cesarean section, admitted for acute abdominal pain in the context of a poorly monitored pregnancy estimated at 25 weeks of amenorrhea. Pelvic ultrasound showed a large peritoneal effusion with the presence of an evolving intrauterine pregnancy with cardiac activity present, the placenta was with anterior coverage. An emergency laparotomy revealed uterine rupture with active hemorrhage localized on the anterior uterine scar with placental protrusion was noted. A cesarean section was quickly performed to save the fetus. The placenta was left in place and a difficult hysterectomy was then undertaken. DISCUSSION: Uterine rupture in second trimester caused by placental percreta is a rare event that can be life threatening for both mother and fetus. Placenta percreta should be considered when diagnosing internal bleeding in a patient during the first trimester of pregnancy.
conclusionPlacenta percreta is a rare but severe obstetric complication that is potentially life threatening for both the mother and fetus. It is important to maintain a high level of clinical suspicion for this disease in pregnant women with acute abdomen, especially those with specific risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.