Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152314›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.

Tiago da Silva Ribeiro, José A Galván, John E Pool

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomics and genetic rescue.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiago da Silva RibeiroDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA.
José A GalvánJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY 10019, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4446-7246
John E PoolDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice · US

Funding

The Architectures and Underpinnings of Adaptive Evolution and Reproductive IsolationR35GM136306 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POOL, JOHN E · 2020 to 2025
$3.5M
Structure-guided antibody targeting of pre-selected epitopes in amyloidogenic aggregatesR35GM136300 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TESSIER, PETER M · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
Unraveling the Molecular and Population Genetic Complexity of Adaptive Trait EvolutionR01GM127480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POOL, JOHN E, REBEIZ, MARK J · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127480NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136300NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local adaptation can lead to elevated genetic differentiation at the targeted genetic variant and nearby sites. Selective sweeps come in different forms, and depending on the initial and final frequencies of a favored variant, very different patterns of genetic variation may be produced. If local selection favors an existing variant that had already recombined onto multiple genetic backgrounds, then the width of elevated genetic differentiation (high FST) may be too narrow to detect using a typical windowed genome scan, even if the targeted variant becomes highly differentiated. We, therefore, used a simulation approach to investigate the power of SNP-level FST (specifically, the maximum SNP FST value within a window, or FST_MaxSNP) to detect diverse scenarios of local adaptation, and compared it against whole-window FST and the Comparative Haplotype Identity statistic. We found that FST_MaxSNP had superior power to detect complete or mostly complete soft sweeps, but lesser power than full-window statistics to detect partial hard sweeps. Nonetheless, the power of FST_MaxSNP depended highly on sample size, and confident outliers depend on robust precautions and quality control. To investigate the relative enrichment of FST_MaxSNP outliers from real data, we applied the two FST statistics to a panel of Drosophila melanogaster populations. We found that FST_MaxSNP had a genome-wide enrichment of outliers compared with demographic expectations, and though it yielded a lesser enrichment than window FST, it detected mostly unique outlier genes and functional categories. Our results suggest that FST_MaxSNP is highly complementary to typical window-based approaches for detecting local adaptation, and merits inclusion in future genome scans and methodologies.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterSelection, GeneticAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesModels, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterlocal adaptationpartial sweepspopulation genomicssoft sweeps

Identifiers

PMID36152314
PMCPMC9557092
OpenAlexW4296949390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.