Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152133›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2022

The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review.

Nicolas Banholzer, Adrian Lison, Dennis Özcelik, Tanja Stadler, Stefan Feuerriegel, Werner Vach

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolas Banholzer *Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. nbanholzer@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-6120
Adrian Lison *Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. adrian.lison@bsse.ethz.ch.
Dennis ÖzcelikChemistry | Biology | Pharmacy Information Center, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tanja StadlerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan FeuerriegelDepartment of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Werner VachBasel Academy for Quality and Research in Medicine, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 186932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effectiveness in improving health-related outcomes has been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fairly large variation among methodologies in use, reflecting the absence of an established methodological framework. On the one hand, variation in methodologies may be desirable to assess the robustness of results; on the other hand, a lack of common standards can impede comparability among studies. To establish a comprehensive overview over the methodologies in use, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions between January 1, 2020 and January 12, 2021 (n = 248). We identified substantial variation in methodologies with respect to study setting, outcome, intervention, methodological approach, and effectiveness assessment. On this basis, we point to shortcomings of existing studies and make recommendations for the design of future studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2SchoolsControl measuresCOVID-19Methodology reviewNon-pharmaceutical interventionsSocial distancing measuresSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36152133
PMCPMC9510554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.