Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152107›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2022

EGFR-TKI re-administration after osimertinib failure in T790M mutation loss cases with re-biopsy.

Shinsuke Ogusu, Ryo Ariyasu, Takahiro Akita, Ayu Kiritani, Ryosuke Tsugitomi, Yoshiaki Amino, Ken Uchibori, Satoru Kitazono, Noriko Yanagitani, Makoto Nishio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shinsuke OgusuDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo AriyasuDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro AkitaDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayu KiritaniDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke TsugitomiDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki AminoDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken UchiboriDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru KitazonoDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko YanagitaniDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto NishioDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. mnishio@jfcr.or.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on the re-administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after osimertinib failure in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration efficacy may vary between patients with T790M loss and those with T790M persistent with re-biopsy after osimertinib treatment. Patients who received EGFR-TKI re-administration (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) after osimertinib failure were identified from our database. T790M mutation status before EGFR-TKI re-administration was analyzed via repeat biopsy. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of EGFR-TKI re-administration, especially differences according to the T790M mutation status, via repeat biopsy. Until June 2020, 28 patients received EGFR-TKI re-administration and 17 underwent repeat biopsy after osimertinib failure. Patients were divided into three groups, including the T790M loss group, where active mutation persisted and T790M was lost (13/17); T790M remaining group, where both the active mutation and T790M persisted (3/17); and active mutation loss group where both the active mutation and T790M were lost (1/17). The overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKI re-administration in the T790M loss group was 31% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54%, which were higher than the ORR of 21% and DCR of 43% in the entire patient population. ORR and DCR of the not re-biopsy group were low (9% and 27%, respectively). The therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI re-administration in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC after osimertinib failure is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration may be considered in cases of T790M loss after repeat biopsy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsBiopsyErbB ReceptorsHumansIndolesMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesEGFR-TKIOsimertinibRe-administrationT790M loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.