Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152053›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Neutral auditory words immediately followed by painful electric shock may show reduced next-day recollection.

Caroline M Norton, James W Ibinson, Samantha J Pcola, Vencislav Popov, Joshua J Tremel, Lynne M Reder, Julie A Fiez, Keith M Vogt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline M NortonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Suite 467, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
James W IbinsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Suite 467, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Samantha J PcolaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Suite 467, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Vencislav PopovCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joshua J TremelDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lynne M RederCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Julie A FiezCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Keith M VogtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Suite 467, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. Keith.Vogt@Pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-8502
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Anesthestic modulation of human memory during acute painK23GM132755 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VOGT, KEITH MICHAEL · 2019 to 2021
$568k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM132755NIGMS NIH HHS K23GM132755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of experimentally delivered acute pain on memory. Twenty-five participants participated in experimental sessions on consecutive days. The first session involved a categorization task to encourage memory encoding. There were two conditions, presented in randomized order, in which participants listened to a series of words, which were repeated three times. In one condition, one-third of the word items were immediately followed by a painful electrical shock. This word-shock pairing was consistent across repetition and the pain-paired items were presented unpredictably. In the other condition, all word items were not associated with pain. Response times over these repeated presentations were assessed for differences. Explicit memory was tested the following day, employing a Remember-Know assessment of word recognition, with no shocks employed. We found evidence that recollection may be reduced for pain-paired words, as the proportion of correct Remember responses (out of total correct responses) was significantly lower. There were no significant reductions in memory for non-pain items that followed painful stimulation after a period of several seconds. Consistent with the experience of pain consuming working memory resources, we theorize that painful shocks interrupt memory encoding for the immediately preceding experimental items, due to a shift in attention away from the word item.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallAttentionHumansPainReaction TimeAuditoryElectric nerve stimulationMemoryPainRecognition

Identifiers

PMID36152053
PMCPMC10190200
OpenAlexW4296970778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.