Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36152036›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2023

Gripping performance in the stick insect Sungaya inexpectata in dependence on the pretarsal architecture.

Julian Winand, Stanislav N Gorb, Thies H Büscher

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional morphology and biomechanics of arthropods.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Julian WinandDepartment of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute of the University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany. jwinand@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.
Stanislav N GorbDepartment of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute of the University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Thies H BüscherDepartment of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute of the University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Kiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect attachment devices and capabilities have been subject to research efforts for decades, and even though during that time considerable progress has been made, numerous questions remain. Different types of attachment devices are known, alongside most of their working principles, however, some details have yet to be understood. For instance, it is not clear why insects for the most part developed pairs of claws, instead of either three or a single one. In this paper, we investigated the gripping forces generated by the stick insect Sungaya inexpectata, in dependence on the number of available claws. The gripping force experiments were carried out on multiple, standardized substrates of known roughness, and conducted in directions both perpendicular and parallel to the substrate. This was repeated two times: first with a single claw being amputated from each of the animals' legs, then with both claws removed, prior to the measurement. The adhesive pads (arolia) and frictional pads (euplantulae) remained intact. It was discovered that the removal of claws had a detractive effect on the gripping forces in both directions, and on all substrates. Notably, this also included the control of smooth surfaces on which the claws were unable to find any asperities to grip on. The results show that there is a direct connection between the adhesive performance of the distal adhesive pad (arolium) and the presence of intact claws. These observations show collective effects between different attachment devices that work in concert during locomotion, and grant insight into why most insects possess two claws.

Indexed as

InsectaLocomotionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaExtremitiesFrictionAroliumAttachment padClawsHolding forcesLocomotionPhasmatodea

Identifiers

PMID36152036
PMCPMC10006028
OpenAlexW4296941333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.