Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151994›Full record

ReviewDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2022

Beta cell endoplasmic reticulum stress drives diabetes in the KINGS mouse without causing mass beta cell loss.

Lydia F Daniels Gatward, Yujin Kim, Aerin Loe, Yiyang Liu, Line Kristensen, Aileen J F King

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia F Daniels GatwardDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.
Yujin KimDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.
Aerin LoeDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.
Yiyang LiuDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.
Line KristensenDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.
Aileen J F KingDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5759-7985
King's College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C16420/A18066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBeta cell endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can cause cellular death and dysfunction and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Animal models of beta cell ER stress are critical in further understanding this and for testing novel diabetes therapeutics. The KINGS mouse is a model of beta cell ER stress driven by a heterozygous mutation in Ins2. In this study, we investigated how beta cell ER stress in the KINGS mouse drives diabetes.

methodsWe investigated whether the unfolded protein response (UPR) was activated in islets isolated from male and female KINGS mice and whether this impacted beta cell mass and turnover.

resultsWhilst the UPR was up-regulated in KINGS islets, with increased protein expression of markers of all three UPR arms, this was not associated with a mass loss of beta cells; beta cell apoptosis rates did not increase until after the development of overt diabetes, and did not lead to substantial changes in beta cell mass.

conclusionWe propose that the KINGS mouse represents a model where beta cell maladaptive UPR signalling drives diabetes development without causing mass beta cell loss.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusInsulin-Secreting CellsAnimalsApoptosisEndoplasmic Reticulum StressFemaleHumansMaleMiceUnfolded Protein Responseapoptosisbeta cellbeta cell massendoplasmic reticulum stressunfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID36151994
PMCPMC9828143
OpenAlexW4296931677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.