Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151932›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral implants research2022

Maxillary bar overdentures on four or six posterior implants: 10-year results from a randomized clinical trial.

Wim Slot, Gerry M Raghoebar, Marco S Cune, Arjan Vissink, Henny J A Meijer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral implants research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07439237 (Implant-supported Maxillary Overdentures; a 15-years Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07439237 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Implant-supported Maxillary Overdentures; a 15-years Evaluation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2026 to 2026Enrolled116ConditionsEdentulous Maxilla, Atrophic, Implants, Dental, OverdentureArmsMaxillary overdenture supported by dental implants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wim SlotDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-4113
Gerry M RaghoebarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-7141
Marco S CuneDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arjan VissinkDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henny J A MeijerDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-6031
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on four and six splinted implants placed in the posterior region during a 10-year follow-up period. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-six edentulous participants with functional maxillary denture complaints and insufficient bone volume to allow implant placement were scheduled for a bone augmentation procedure. After healing, participants were randomized to receive either four or six implants in the posterior maxilla. After 3 months of osseointegration, a bar overdenture was constructed. Implant survival, overdenture survival, clinical scores, peri-implant bone height changes, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

resultsForty-six participants completed the 10-year follow-up. Implant survival was 100% in the 4-implant group and 96.7% in the 6-implant group. Seven new overdentures were made in the 4-implant group and 12 new overdentures were made in the 6-implant group due to excessive wear of the denture base and teeth. Clinical parameters did not differ significantly between groups. Mean marginal bone loss compared to baseline was 0.41 ± 0.37 mm in the 4-implant group and 0.70 ± 1.07 mm in the 6-implant group. Overall, patient satisfaction improved significantly, but did not differ between groups.

conclusionFrom this 10-year follow-up trial, it was concluded that bar maxillary overdentures on four or six implants in the posterior region of an augmented maxilla resulted in a comparable treatment outcome with high implant survival, limited loss of peri-implant marginal bone, and high patients' satisfaction. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR9729).

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsJaw, EdentulousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayDenture RetentionHumansMaxillaTreatment OutcomeDental Implantsdental implantsedentuloushealthy agingmaxillaoverdenture

Identifiers

PMID36151932
PMCPMC9828494
OpenAlexW4296929672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.