Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151783›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Computer-aided Design of Distal Femoral Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee and Effect of Correction Angle on Joint Loading by Finite Element Analysis.

Yanfei Wu, Xin Jin, Xingwen Zhao, Ying Wang, Haohao Bai, Bin Lu, Xue Tong, Jianxiong Ma, Xinlong Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Joint line and knee osteotomy.EFORT open reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In closed wedge distal femur osteotomies for correction of valgus malalignment overcorrection of mLDFA should be avoided.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanfei WuClinical College of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xin JinTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xingwen ZhaoClinical College of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Ying WangTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haohao BaiTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Bin LuTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xue TongTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Jianxiong MaTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xinlong MaClinical College of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8932-3110
Tianjin University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11772226National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572154National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871777Tianjin Science and Technology Committee 16ZXZNGX00130Tianjin Science and Technology Committee 18PTLCSY00070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLateral open-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) has been used to treat valgus deformity of the knee, with good clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack of biomechanical studies regarding the angle of correction. The objective of this study was to apply computer-aided design (CAD) for osteotomy planning in a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical model and to assess the biomechanical differences among the varying correction angles on joint loading by finite element analysis (FEA).

methodsTo model different angles of lateral open-wedge DFO correction, the CAD software package Mimics 21.0 was used to accurately simulate the operated knee. The femur was cut to 0°, 2°, 4°, 6°, 8°, and 10° of varus (equivalent to hip-knee-ankle angles of 180°, 178°, 176°, 174°, 172°, and 170°, respectively). The original knee model and the corrected models were processed by FE software. Then, the FE models were subjected to an axial force to obtain the von Mises stress (VMS) and shear stress distributions within the femoral cartilages and menisci.

resultsUnder a compressive load of 740 N, the highest VMS in lateral and medial compartments of the intact knee model was 3.418 and 3.303 MPa. The maximum value of both the VMS and the shear stress in the lateral compartment decreased as the varus angle increased, but the corresponding values in the medial compartment increased. When the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was 180°, the VMS in the lateral and medial compartments was balanced (3.418 and 3.303 MPa, respectively). Meanwhile, when the HKA angle was 178° (3.488 and 3.625 MPa, respectively), the shear stress in the lateral and medial compartments was balanced. In addition, the magnitude of change in the stress was significantly higher in the medial compartment (90.9%) than in the lateral compartment (19.3%).

conclusionThe optimal correction angle of the valgus knee is close to neutral alignment or slightly varus (0° - 2°). Overcorrection is not recommended, as it can result in a steep increase of the stress within the medial compartment and may accelerate the process of medial compartment OA.

Indexed as

Knee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer-Aided DesignFinite Element AnalysisHumansLower ExtremityOsteotomyTibiaCartilageFinite element analysisMeniscusShear stressVon Mises

Identifiers

PMID36151783
PMCPMC9627055
OpenAlexW4297184677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.