Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151739›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Community-based social care models for indigenous people with disability: A scoping review of scholarly and policy literature.

Stefanie Puszka, Corinne Walsh, Francis Markham, Jody Barney, Mandy Yap, Tony Dreise

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie PuszkaCentre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5008-8122
Corinne WalshCentre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Francis MarkhamCentre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Jody BarneyDeaf Indigenous Community Consultancy, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia.
Mandy YapCentre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Tony DreiseCentre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Australian National University · AUGoulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disability is experienced and understood by Indigenous people internationally in distinct ways from other populations, requiring different approaches in disability services. Furthermore, Indigenous populations access disability services at low rates. In response, policymakers, service providers and Indigenous organisations have developed specific models of care for Indigenous people with disability. Social care services, comprising personal care, transport and social activities, can support Indigenous people with disability to live with their families and in their communities. However, little is known about the range of social care models for Indigenous people with disability. To inform policy and practice, we conducted a scoping review of community-based models of social care designed to meet the needs of Indigenous peoples in Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand, Canada and the United States. Our methods were informed by best practice scoping review principles and a collaborative approach that centred Indigenous voices within research appraisal and project governance processes. Literature searches (conducted March-April 2021) yielded 25 results reporting on 10 models of care. We identified two over-arching themes (funding and governance arrangements; service delivery design) that encompass nine key characteristics of the included models. Our analysis shows promising practice in contextually relevant place-based social activity programs, support and remuneration for family carers and workforce strategies that integrate Indigenous staff roles with kinship relationships and social roles. While more research and evaluation are needed, disability funding bodies and service systems that facilitate these areas of promising practice may improve the accessibility of social care for Indigenous peoples.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousPersons with DisabilitiesHumansIndigenous PeoplesPolicySocial SupportUnited Statescommunity-controlleddisabilitygovernanceindigenoussocial careworkforce

Identifiers

PMID36151739
PMCPMC10087272
OpenAlexW4296876647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.