ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022
How does the structure of data impact cell-cell similarity? Evaluating how structural properties influence the performance of proximity metrics in single cell RNA-seq data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab induce hyper-progression in renal medullary carcinoma: results of a phase II trial and preclinical evidence.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Leiomodin 1 deficiency promotes lipid accumulation and redirects gene regulatory programs in smooth muscle cells exposed to oxidized LDL.Research square · 2026Article
- Functional xenogeneic hematopoietic cells maintaining donor-dominant identity and immune tolerance enable therapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Müller glia-mediated regeneration restores neuronal diversity and retinal circuit organization in the adult zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cortical versus hippocampal network dysfunction in a human brain assembloid model of epilepsy and intellectual disability.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Understanding rheumatic disease through continuous cell state analysis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- ESCHR: a hyperparameter-randomized ensemble approach for robust clustering across diverse datasets.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Systematic analysis on the horse-shoe-like effect in PCA plots of scRNA-seq data.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- The specious art of single-cell genomics.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Effect of distance measures on confidences of t-SNE embeddings and its implications on clustering for scRNA-seq data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The impact of similarity metrics on cell-type clustering in highly multiplexed in situ imaging cytometry data.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately identifying cell-populations is paramount to the quality of downstream analyses and overall interpretations of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) datasets but remains a challenge. The quality of single-cell clustering depends on the proximity metric used to generate cell-to-cell distances. Accordingly, proximity metrics have been benchmarked for scRNA-seq clustering, typically with results averaged across datasets to identify a highest performing metric. However, the 'best-performing' metric varies between studies, with the performance differing significantly between datasets. This suggests that the unique structural properties of an scRNA-seq dataset, specific to the biological system under study, have a substantial impact on proximity metric performance. Previous benchmarking studies have omitted to factor the structural properties into their evaluations. To address this gap, we developed a framework for the in-depth evaluation of the performance of 17 proximity metrics with respect to core structural properties of scRNA-seq data, including sparsity, dimensionality, cell-population distribution and rarity. We find that clustering performance can be improved substantially by the selection of an appropriate proximity metric and neighbourhood size for the structural properties of a dataset, in addition to performing suitable pre-processing and dimensionality reduction. Furthermore, popular metrics such as Euclidean and Manhattan distance performed poorly in comparison to several lessor applied metrics, suggesting that the default metric for many scRNA-seq methods should be re-evaluated. Our findings highlight the critical nature of tailoring scRNA-seq analyses pipelines to the dataset under study and provide practical guidance for researchers looking to optimize cell-similarity search for the structural properties of their own data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.