Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151524›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Quantitative gait analysis in mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and cognitively intact individuals: a cross-sectional case-control study.

Sunee Bovonsunthonchai, Roongtiwa Vachalathiti, Vimonwan Hiengkaew, Mon S Bryant, Jim Richards, Vorapun Senanarong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sunee BovonsunthonchaiFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1044-3174
Roongtiwa VachalathitiFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4626-1463
Vimonwan HiengkaewFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0842-6976
Mon S BryantDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6016-8169
Jim RichardsAllied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4004-3115
Vorapun SenanarongDivision of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. vorapun.sen@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0002-2774-4187
Mahidol University · THBaylor College of Medicine · USSiriraj Hospital · THUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive age-related decline is linked to dementia development and gait has been proposed to measure the change in brain function. This study aimed to investigate if spatiotemporal gait variables could be used to differentiate between the three cognitive status groups.

methodsNinety-three older adults were screened and classified into three groups; mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 32), dementia (n = 31), and a cognitively intact (n = 30). Spatiotemporal gait variables were assessed under single- and dual-tasks using an objective platform system. Effects of cognitive status and walking task were analyzed using a two-way ANCOVA. Sub-comparisons for between- and within-group were performed by one-way ANCOVA and Paired t-tests. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was used to discriminate between three groups on gait variables.

resultsThere were significant effects (P < 0.05) of cognitive status during both single and dual-task walking in several variables between the MCI and dementia and between dementia and cognitively intact groups, while no difference was seen between the MCI and cognitively intact groups. A large differentiation effect between the groups was found for step length, stride length, and gait speed during both conditions of walking.

conclusionsSpatiotemporal gait variables showed discriminative ability between dementia and cognitively intact groups in both single and dual-tasks. This suggests that gait could potentially be used as a clinical differentiation marker for individuals with cognitive problems.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesGaitGait AnalysisHumansClassificationDementiaGaitMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID36151524
PMCPMC9502583
OpenAlexW4296825675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.