Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151519›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Organizing the bacterial annotation space with amino acid sequence embeddings.

Susanna R Grigson, Jody C McKerral, James G Mitchell, Robert A Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanna R GrigsonFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia. susie.grigson@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4738-3451
Jody C McKerralFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-6695
James G MitchellFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-0935
Robert A EdwardsFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-8949

Funding

Computational and Experimental Resources for Virome Analysis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CERVAID)RC2DK116713 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$8.9M
Australian Research Council DP220102915NIDDK NIH HHS RC2 DK116713NIH HHS RC2DK116713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the ever-expanding gap between the number of proteins being discovered and their functional characterization, protein function inference remains a fundamental challenge in computational biology. Currently, known protein annotations are organized in human-curated ontologies, however, all possible protein functions may not be organized accurately. Meanwhile, recent advancements in natural language processing and machine learning have developed models which embed amino acid sequences as vectors in n-dimensional space. So far, these embeddings have primarily been used to classify protein sequences using manually constructed protein classification schemes.

resultsIn this work, we describe the use of amino acid sequence embeddings as a systematic framework for studying protein ontologies. Using a sequence embedding, we show that the bacterial carbohydrate metabolism class within the SEED annotation system contains 48 clusters of embedded sequences despite this class containing 29 functional labels. Furthermore, by embedding Bacillus amino acid sequences with unknown functions, we show that these unknown sequences form clusters that are likely to have similar biological roles.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that amino acid sequence embeddings may be a powerful tool for developing more robust ontologies for annotating protein sequence data. In addition, embeddings may be beneficial for clustering protein sequences with unknown functions and selecting optimal candidate proteins to characterize experimentally.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsAmino Acid SequenceBacteriaHumansMachine LearningMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsBacteriaFunction predictionMachine learningProtein ontologySequence embedding

Identifiers

PMID36151519
PMCPMC9502642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.