Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151482›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2022

Sensory processing sensitivity and axonal microarchitecture: identifying brain structural characteristics for behavior.

Szabolcs David, Lucy L Brown, Anneriet M Heemskerk, Elaine Aron, Alexander Leemans, Arthur Aron

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Szabolcs David *Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.david@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-3895
Lucy L Brown *Department of Neurology, Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Anneriet M HeemskerkImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elaine AronDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Alexander Leemans *Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arthur Aron *Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLStony Brook University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VIDI Grant 639.072.411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research using functional MRI identified brain regions associated with sensory processing sensitivity (SPS), a proposed normal phenotype trait. To further validate SPS, to characterize it anatomically, and to test the usefulness in psychology of methodologies that assess axonal properties, the present study correlated SPS proxy questionnaire scores (adjusted for neuroticism) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures. Participants (n = 408) from the Human Connectome Project were studied. Voxelwise analysis showed that mean- and radial diffusivity correlated positively with SPS scores in the right and left subcallosal and anterior-ventral cingulum bundle, and the right forceps minor of the corpus callosum, all frontal cortex areas generally underlying emotion, motivation, and cognition. Further analyses showed correlations throughout medial frontal cortical regions in the right and left ventromedial prefrontal cortex, including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, uncinate, and arcuate fasciculus. Fractional anisotropy was negatively correlated with SPS scores in white matter (WM) of the right premotor/motor/somatosensory/supramarginal gyrus regions. Region of interest (ROI) analysis showed small effect sizes (- 0.165 to 0.148) in WM of the precuneus and inferior frontal gyrus. Other ROI effects were found in the dorsal-, ventral visual pathways and primary auditory cortex. The results reveal that in a large group of participants, axonal microarchitectural differences can be identified with SPS traits that are subtle and in the range of typical behavior. The results suggest that the heightened sensory processing in people who show that SPS may be influenced by the microstructure of WM in specific cortical regions. Although previous fMRI studies had identified most of these areas, the DTI results put a new focus on brain areas related to attention and cognitive flexibility, empathy, emotion, and first levels of sensory processing, as in primary auditory cortex. Psychological trait characterization may benefit from DTI methodology by identifying influential brain systems for traits.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingWhite MatterAnisotropyBrainHumansPerceptionCingulum microstructureDiffusion MRIDiffusion tensor imagingHighly sensitive peopleMean diffusivitySensory processing sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID36151482
PMCPMC9618477
OpenAlexW4297017171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.