Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151454›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Limb, joint and pelvic kinematic control in the quail coping with steps upwards and downwards.

Emanuel Andrada, Oliver Mothes, Heiko Stark, Matthew C Tresch, Joachim Denzler, Martin S Fischer, Reinhard Blickhan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emanuel AndradaInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany. emanuel.andrada@uni-jena.de.
Oliver MothesComputer Vision Group, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Heiko StarkInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Matthew C TreschDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joachim DenzlerComputer Vision Group, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Martin S FischerInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Reinhard BlickhanScience of Motion, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DENorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small cursorial birds display remarkable walking skills and can negotiate complex and unstructured terrains with ease. The neuromechanical control strategies necessary to adapt to these challenging terrains are still not well understood. Here, we analyzed the 2D- and 3D pelvic and leg kinematic strategies employed by the common quail to negotiate visible steps (upwards and downwards) of about 10%, and 50% of their leg length. We used biplanar fluoroscopy to accurately describe joint positions in three dimensions and performed semi-automatic landmark localization using deep learning. Quails negotiated the vertical obstacles without major problems and rapidly regained steady-state locomotion. When coping with step upwards, the quail mostly adapted the trailing limb to permit the leading leg to step on the elevated substrate similarly as it did during level locomotion. When negotiated steps downwards, both legs showed significant adaptations. For those small and moderate step heights that did not induce aerial running, the quail kept the kinematic pattern of the distal joints largely unchanged during uneven locomotion, and most changes occurred in proximal joints. The hip regulated leg length, while the distal joints maintained the spring-damped limb patterns. However, to negotiate the largest visible steps, more dramatic kinematic alterations were observed. There all joints contributed to leg lengthening/shortening in the trailing leg, and both the trailing and leading legs stepped more vertically and less abducted. In addition, locomotion speed was decreased. We hypothesize a shift from a dynamic walking program to more goal-directed motions that might be focused on maximizing safety.

Indexed as

QuailRunningAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitLocomotionWalking

Identifiers

PMID36151454
PMCPMC9508109
OpenAlexW4297038526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.