Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151404›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Mandibular stability and condylar changes following orthognathic surgery in mandibular hypoplasia patients associated with preoperative condylar resorption.

Minjiao Wang, Yifeng Qian, Hanjiang Zhao, Min Zhu, Hongbo Yu, Steve Gf Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Minjiao WangDepartment of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, 200011, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-0352
Yifeng QianDepartment of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, 200011, Shanghai, China.
Hanjiang ZhaoDepartment of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, 200011, Shanghai, China.
Min ZhuDepartment of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, 200011, Shanghai, China.
Hongbo Yu *Department of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, 200011, Shanghai, China. yhb3508@163.com.
Steve Gf Shen *Department of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, 200011, Shanghai, China. maxillofacsurg@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate postoperative mandibular stability and condylar changes in patients with mandibular hypoplasia and preoperative condylar resorption (CR) undergoing orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired preoperatively (T0), 2-7 days immediate postoperatively (T1), and at least 1 year postoperatively (T2). Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis and measurements of condylar angle, volume, and position (joint spaces) were performed. A 2-mm mandibular relapse was deemed clinically acceptable. We also analyzed the correlations between relapse and postoperative CR and susceptible factors using a multivariate logistic regression model.

resultsThe results showed one year after the surgery, the average mandibular relapse was 1.0 mm (p < 0.05), and the average reduction of condylar volume was 152.4 mm

conclusionsWhile patients with mandibular hypoplasia and preoperative CR were vulnerable to further condylar resorption after mandibular advancement, the treatment outcomes were generally clinically acceptable. Postoperative relapse was associated with a larger than 4.2 mm of mandibular advancement measured at B-CP and a larger than 1.6 mm of superior joint space measured at SJS, and postoperative CR was associated with a larger than 1.8 mm of mandibular vertical increasement measured at B-AP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggested that the mandibular advancement might be limited to 5 mm for patients with preoperative CR. A concomitant advancement genioplasty might also be considered to achieve a better facial profile in these patients.

Indexed as

Orthognathic SurgeryCephalometryHumansMandibular CondyleOsteotomy, Sagittal Split RamusRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesCondylar resorptionCondylar volumeJoint spacesMandibular hypoplasiaOrthognathic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.