ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Mandibular stability and condylar changes following orthognathic surgery in mandibular hypoplasia patients associated with preoperative condylar resorption.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cone-Beam CT-Based Analysis of Temporomandibular Joint Osseous Changes in Orthognathic Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CBCT image based radiomic analysis for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning-based assessment of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery of asymmetric dentofacial deformities.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- 3D analysis of condylar and mandibular remodeling one year after intra-oral ramus vertical lengthening osteotomy.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Etiology and Diagnosis for Idiopathic Condylar Resorption in Growing Adolescents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate postoperative mandibular stability and condylar changes in patients with mandibular hypoplasia and preoperative condylar resorption (CR) undergoing orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired preoperatively (T0), 2-7 days immediate postoperatively (T1), and at least 1 year postoperatively (T2). Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis and measurements of condylar angle, volume, and position (joint spaces) were performed. A 2-mm mandibular relapse was deemed clinically acceptable. We also analyzed the correlations between relapse and postoperative CR and susceptible factors using a multivariate logistic regression model.
resultsThe results showed one year after the surgery, the average mandibular relapse was 1.0 mm (p < 0.05), and the average reduction of condylar volume was 152.4 mm
conclusionsWhile patients with mandibular hypoplasia and preoperative CR were vulnerable to further condylar resorption after mandibular advancement, the treatment outcomes were generally clinically acceptable. Postoperative relapse was associated with a larger than 4.2 mm of mandibular advancement measured at B-CP and a larger than 1.6 mm of superior joint space measured at SJS, and postoperative CR was associated with a larger than 1.8 mm of mandibular vertical increasement measured at B-AP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggested that the mandibular advancement might be limited to 5 mm for patients with preoperative CR. A concomitant advancement genioplasty might also be considered to achieve a better facial profile in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36151404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.