ReviewMolecular biology reports2022
Genome sequence assembly algorithms and misassembly identification methods.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence supporting the first secondary chromosome in Actinobacteria as a hallmark of theMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level reference genome assembly of the gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) and population genomics offer insights into the falcon population in Mongolia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Klumpy: A tool to evaluate the integrity of long-read genome assemblies and illusive sequence motifs.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- ASVBM: Structural variant benchmarking with local joint analysis for multiple callsets.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sequence assembly algorithms have rapidly evolved with the vigorous growth of genome sequencing technology over the past two decades. Assembly mainly uses the iterative expansion of overlap relationships between sequences to construct the target genome. The assembly algorithms can be typically classified into several categories, such as the Greedy strategy, Overlap-Layout-Consensus (OLC) strategy, and de Bruijn graph (DBG) strategy. In particular, due to the rapid development of third-generation sequencing (TGS) technology, some prevalent assembly algorithms have been proposed to generate high-quality chromosome-level assemblies. However, due to the genome complexity, the length of short reads, and the high error rate of long reads, contigs produced by assembly may contain misassemblies adversely affecting downstream data analysis. Therefore, several read-based and reference-based methods for misassembly identification have been developed to improve assembly quality. This work primarily reviewed the development of DNA sequencing technologies and summarized sequencing data simulation methods, sequencing error correction methods, various mainstream sequence assembly algorithms, and misassembly identification methods. A large amount of computation makes the sequence assembly problem more challenging, and therefore, it is necessary to develop more efficient and accurate assembly algorithms and alternative algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36151399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.