Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151399›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2022

Genome sequence assembly algorithms and misassembly identification methods.

Yue Meng, Yu Lei, Jianlong Gao, Yuxuan Liu, Enze Ma, Yunhong Ding, Yixin Bian, Hongquan Zu, Yucui Dong, Xiao Zhu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ASVBM: Structural variant benchmarking with local joint analysis for multiple callsets.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yue Meng *School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yu Lei *Department of Big Data and Intelligent Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Technology, Yangquan, Shanxi, China.
Jianlong GaoSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yuxuan LiuSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Enze MaSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yunhong DingSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yixin BianSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Hongquan ZuCenter of Network and Information, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yucui DongDepartment of Immunology, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, China. dongyucui521@yeah.net.
Xiao ZhuSchool of Computer and Control Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, Shandong, China. zhuxiao_hit@yeah.net.

Funding

Binzhou Medical University 50012304325Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2017-KYYWF-0140National Natural Science Foundation of China 61902094Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province QC2018082Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2021MH036University Nursing Program for Young Scholar with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province UNPYSCT-2018183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sequence assembly algorithms have rapidly evolved with the vigorous growth of genome sequencing technology over the past two decades. Assembly mainly uses the iterative expansion of overlap relationships between sequences to construct the target genome. The assembly algorithms can be typically classified into several categories, such as the Greedy strategy, Overlap-Layout-Consensus (OLC) strategy, and de Bruijn graph (DBG) strategy. In particular, due to the rapid development of third-generation sequencing (TGS) technology, some prevalent assembly algorithms have been proposed to generate high-quality chromosome-level assemblies. However, due to the genome complexity, the length of short reads, and the high error rate of long reads, contigs produced by assembly may contain misassemblies adversely affecting downstream data analysis. Therefore, several read-based and reference-based methods for misassembly identification have been developed to improve assembly quality. This work primarily reviewed the development of DNA sequencing technologies and summarized sequencing data simulation methods, sequencing error correction methods, various mainstream sequence assembly algorithms, and misassembly identification methods. A large amount of computation makes the sequence assembly problem more challenging, and therefore, it is necessary to develop more efficient and accurate assembly algorithms and alternative algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomeBase SequenceHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareGenome assembly algorithmsGenome sequencing technologyMisassembly identification methodsThird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.