Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151305›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development and testing of diagnostic algorithms to identify patients with acromegaly in Southern Italian claims databases.

Salvatore Crisafulli, Andrea Fontana, Luca L'Abbate, Valentina Ientile, Daniele Gianfrilli, Alessia Cozzolino, Maria Cristina De Martino, Marta Ragonese, Janet Sultana, Francesco Barone-Adesi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acromegaly diagnosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvatore CrisafulliDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea FontanaUnit of Biostatistics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Luca L'AbbateDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Valentina IentileDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Daniele GianfrilliSection of Medical Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessia CozzolinoSection of Medical Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Cristina De MartinoDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Marta RagoneseDepartment of Human Pathology of Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi" DETEV, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Janet SultanaCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Francesco Barone-AdesiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Gianluca TrifiròDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. gianluca.trifiro@univr.it.
University of Verona · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Messina · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by an excessive production of growth-hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1, typically resulting from a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. This study was aimed at comparing and measuring accuracy of newly and previously developed coding algorithms for the identification of acromegaly using Italian claims databases. This study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2018, using data from the claims databases of Caserta Local Health Unit (LHU) and Sicily Region in Southern Italy. To detect acromegaly cases from the general target population, four algorithms were developed using combinations of diagnostic, surgical procedure and co-payment exemption codes, pharmacy claims and specialist's visits. Algorithm accuracy was assessed by measuring the Youden Index, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. The percentage of positive cases for each algorithm ranged from 7.9 (95% CI 6.4-9.8) to 13.8 (95% CI 11.7-16.2) per 100,000 inhabitants in Caserta LHU and from 7.8 (95% CI 7.1-8.6) to 16.4 (95% CI 15.3-17.5) in Sicily Region. Sensitivity of the different algorithms ranged from 71.1% (95% CI 54.1-84.6%) to 84.2% (95% CI 68.8-94.0%), while specificity was always higher than 99.9%. The algorithm based on the presence of claims suggestive of acromegaly in ≥ 2 different databases (i.e., hospital discharge records, copayment exemptions registry, pharmacy claims and specialist visits registry) achieved the highest Youden Index (84.2) and the highest positive predictive value (34.8; 95% CI 28.6-41.6). We tested four algorithms to identify acromegaly cases using claims databases with high sensitivity and Youden Index. Despite identifying rare diseases using real-world data is challenging, this study showed that robust validity testing may yield the identification of accurate coding algorithms.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdenomaHuman Growth HormoneAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor ISicilyHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor I

Identifiers

PMID36151305
PMCPMC9508179
OpenAlexW4296999370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.