Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151299›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2023

Neurological examination at 32-weeks postmenstrual age predicts 12-month cognitive outcomes in very preterm-born infants.

Isabel U Huf, Emmah Baque, Paul B Colditz, Mark D Chatfield, Robert S Ware, Roslyn N Boyd, Joanne M George

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Systematic Review of Neurodevelopmental Tools for Preterm Infants During Infancy: Mapping the Components Across Infant Age Quarters.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel U HufSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Emmah BaqueSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Paul B ColditzUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mark D ChatfieldQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, Centre for Children's Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Robert S WareMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Roslyn N BoydQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, Centre for Children's Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Joanne M GeorgeQueensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, Centre for Children's Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. j.george2@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-6564
The University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) at 30-32 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA, 'Early') and term equivalent age (TEA) in infants born <31 weeks PMA to predict cognitive outcomes at 12 months corrected age (CA).

methodsProspective cohort study of 119 infants (73 males; median 28.4 weeks gestational age at birth) who underwent Early and TEA HNNE. At 12 months CA, 104 participants completed Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition, (Bayley-III). Optimum cut-off points for each HNNE subscale were determined to establish diagnostic accuracy for predicting adverse cognitive outcomes on the Bayley-III Cognitive Composite Scale (≤85).

resultsThe best diagnostic accuracy for HNNE total score at 30-32 weeks PMA predicting cognitive impairment occurred at cut-off ≤16.7 (sensitivity (Se) = 71%, specificity (Sp) = 51%). The Abnormal Signs subscale demonstrated the best balance of sensitivity/specificity combination (Se = 71%, Sp = 71%; cut-off ≤1.5). For HNNE at TEA, the total score at cut-off ≤24.5 had Se = 71% and Sp = 47% for predicting cognitive impairment. The Tone Patterns subscale demonstrated the strongest diagnostic accuracy at TEA (Se = 71%, Sp = 63%; cut-off ≤3).

conclusionsEarly and TEA HNNE demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for cognitive outcomes at 12-months CA in infants born <31 weeks gestational age. CLINICAL

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12613000280707; web address of trial: http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12613000280707.aspx . IMPACT: Early Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) assessment at 30-32 weeks postmenstrual age has moderate diagnostic accuracy for cognitive outcomes at 12 months corrected age in infants born <31 weeks gestation. Early HNNE at 30-32 weeks has stronger predictive validity than HNNE at term equivalent age. Early HNNE may provide an early marker for risk-stratification to optimise the planning of post-discharge support and follow-up services for infants born preterm.

Indexed as

AftercareInfant, Extremely PrematureAustraliaChild DevelopmentCognitionFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeurologic ExaminationPatient DischargeProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36151299
PMCPMC10172122
OpenAlexW4297020697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.