Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Lesion identification and malignancy prediction from clinical dermatological images.

Meng Xia, Meenal K Kheterpal, Samantha C Wong, Christine Park, William Ratliff, Lawrence Carin, Ricardo Henao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng XiaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA. meng.xia@duke.edu.
Meenal K KheterpalDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Samantha C WongSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christine ParkSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
William RatliffDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lawrence CarinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Ricardo HenaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Duke University · USDuke Institute for Health Innovation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider machine-learning-based lesion identification and malignancy prediction from clinical dermatological images, which can be indistinctly acquired via smartphone or dermoscopy capture. Additionally, we do not assume that images contain single lesions, thus the framework supports both focal or wide-field images. Specifically, we propose a two-stage approach in which we first identify all lesions present in the image regardless of sub-type or likelihood of malignancy, then it estimates their likelihood of malignancy, and through aggregation, it also generates an image-level likelihood of malignancy that can be used for high-level screening processes. Further, we consider augmenting the proposed approach with clinical covariates (from electronic health records) and publicly available data (the ISIC dataset). Comprehensive experiments validated on an independent test dataset demonstrate that (1) the proposed approach outperforms alternative model architectures; (2) the model based on images outperforms a pure clinical model by a large margin, and the combination of images and clinical data does not significantly improves over the image-only model; and (3) the proposed framework offers comparable performance in terms of malignancy classification relative to three board certified dermatologists with different levels of experience.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDermoscopyHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36151257
PMCPMC9508136
OpenAlexW4296826632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.