Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151132›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A machine learning approach for predicting suicidal ideation in post stroke patients.

Seung Il Song, Hyeon Taek Hong, Changwoo Lee, Seung Bo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seung Il SongDepartment Occupational Therapy, Gumi University, Yaeun-ro 37, Gumi, 39213, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-1643
Hyeon Taek HongDepartment Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-2742
Changwoo LeeOffice Hospital Information, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung Bo LeeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Dalgubeol-daero 1095, Dalseo-gu, Daegu, 42601, South Korea. koreateam23@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6817-5793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the identification of stroke patients with an increased suicide risk is mainly based on self-report questionnaires, and this method suffers from a lack of objectivity. This study developed and validated a suicide ideation (SI) prediction model using clinical data and identified SI predictors. Significant variables were selected through traditional statistical analysis based on retrospective data of 385 stroke patients; the data were collected from October 2012 to March 2014. The data were then applied to three boosting models (Xgboost, CatBoost, and LGBM) to identify the comparative and best performing models. Demographic variables that showed significant differences between the two groups were age, onset, type, socioeconomic, and education level. Additionally, functional variables also showed a significant difference with regard to ADL and emotion (p < 0.05). The CatBoost model (0.900) showed higher performance than the other two models; and depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and rehabilitation motivation were found to have high importance. Negative emotions such as depression and anxiety showed a positive relationship with SI and rehabilitation motivation and self-efficacy displayed an inverse relationship with SI. Machine learning-based SI models could augment SI prevention by helping rehabilitation and medical professionals identify high-risk stroke patients in need of SI prevention intervention.

Indexed as

AnxietySuicidal IdeationAnxiety DisordersHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36151132
PMCPMC9508242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.