Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36151098›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

Public opinion towards global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines - Data from Germany and the United States.

Matthias Klumpp, Ida G Monfared, Sebastian Vollmer

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias KlumppGeorg-August-University of Göttingen, Department of Business Administration, Chair for Production and Logistics, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-2751
Ida G MonfaredGeorg-August-University of Göttingen, Department of Economics, Centre for Modern Indian Studies, Waldweg 26, 37073, Göttingen, Germany. ida.gohardoustmonfared@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6990-2350
Sebastian VollmerGeorg-August-University of Göttingen, Department of Economics, Centre for Modern Indian Studies, Waldweg 26, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7863-0462
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RTG 1723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study gathered evidence from Germany and the United States on public opinion towards fair distribution of COVID-19 vaccines across the world. Analytical Hierarchy Process and discrete choice experiments were used for this purpose. The sample is nationally representative of adults (aged 18 and above) for both countries using quotas on age, gender, education, state, and COVID-19 vaccination rates at the time of the fieldwork (25 May 2021 to 26 June 2021). Overall 1,003 responses in Germany and 1,000 in the United States were collected.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultGermanyHumansPublic OpinionUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36151098
PMCPMC9508102
OpenAlexW4297013671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.