Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36150740›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Improving epinephrine autoinjector usability and carriage frequency among patients at risk of anaphylaxis: a quality improvement initiative.

Ahdad Ziyar, Jimmy Kwon, Arthur Li, Asal Naderi, Tiffany Jean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Needle-to-bone safety margin of adrenaline auto-injectors in Japanese children: Impact of injection site variation.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahdad ZiyarDivision of Basic and Clinical Immunology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Jimmy KwonDepartment of Statistics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Arthur LiJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Asal NaderiDepartment of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tiffany JeanDivision of Basic and Clinical Immunology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA tjean1@hs.uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5468-360X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) are crucial for the management of anaphylaxis, patient carriage frequency of EAI is as low as 57% and usage of EAIs is erroneous 35%-43% of the time. Our objective was to improve patient carrying frequency of EAI and understanding of EAI usage.We implemented a quality improvement initiative using consistent closed-loop education, redesigned clinic workflow, electronic medical record reminder-based interventions, and educational materials to improve patient EAI carriage compliance and understanding of EAI indications and proper technique.The percentage of our patients who carried the EAI at all times increased from 55% to 93% in 6 months. Participants knowledge of EAI indications also improved from 22% to 91%. Patient demonstration scores of the EAI device improved from 21% to 91% as well.Our quality improvement interventions demonstrated a significant improvement>80% in EAI carriage frequency, knowledge of indications, and proper device technique.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisElectronic Health RecordsEpinephrineHumansQuality ImprovementEpinephrineHealthcare quality improvementPatient educationQuality improvementQuality improvement methodologies

Identifiers

PMID36150740
PMCPMC9511578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.